2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values and attitude certainty: The case for attitude clarity and correctness

Abstract: Three studies examined how the perception that one’s attitudes are based in values affects attitude clarity and correctness. Specifically, perceiving that one’s attitude is based in important values increases attitude clarity (the subjective sense that one knows one’s attitude) but not attitude correctness (the subjective sense that the attitude is correct). To test this, participants read a counterattitudinal message and were given feedback about the basis of their attitude. Relative to participants who learn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we adapted a bogus feedback manipulation that targets participants' perceptions of their thoughts on order to create a desired resistance strategy. While similar manipulations have been successful in affecting resistance success (Tormala and Petty, 2002) and attitude attributes such as value basis (Blankenship et al, 2022), we submit that it is unclear whether participants in the current experiments fully internalized the feedback. Therefore, in addition to devoting future research to exploring other means of manipulating resistance strategy (e.g., a bolstering mindset; Xu and Wyer, 2012), it would also be useful to implement the current manipulation in conjunction with a measure that assesses participants' ability to internalize the feedback as a manipulation check.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Specifically, we adapted a bogus feedback manipulation that targets participants' perceptions of their thoughts on order to create a desired resistance strategy. While similar manipulations have been successful in affecting resistance success (Tormala and Petty, 2002) and attitude attributes such as value basis (Blankenship et al, 2022), we submit that it is unclear whether participants in the current experiments fully internalized the feedback. Therefore, in addition to devoting future research to exploring other means of manipulating resistance strategy (e.g., a bolstering mindset; Xu and Wyer, 2012), it would also be useful to implement the current manipulation in conjunction with a measure that assesses participants' ability to internalize the feedback as a manipulation check.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%