2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey

Abstract: Human values are assessed biannually in a multinational sample as part of the European Social Survey (ESS). Based on theories of adaptive ageing, it was predicted that ten lower order values and four higher order values would show age differences that would be invariant across (a) two sample cohorts (2002 and 2008), (b) gender and (c) 12 industrialised nations. The value categories measured by the ESS are the following: conservative values (tradition, conformity and security), openness to change values (self-d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
89
2
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
20
89
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that other priorities might be more prominent for young adults, such as intimacy and the search for a partner (Kenrick et al, 2010), which could explain the relative decrease in promotion values. A similar pattern was also reported by Robinson (2013, Figure 1), who observed that promotion-related values such as achievement started decreasing at age 20 and only started increasing again after age 60. As expected, men tended to place greater emphasis on promotion values compared to women (Robinson, 2013;Schwartz & Rubel, 2005).…”
Section: The Pattern Of Values Development: Modeling Age and Gender Esupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We speculate that other priorities might be more prominent for young adults, such as intimacy and the search for a partner (Kenrick et al, 2010), which could explain the relative decrease in promotion values. A similar pattern was also reported by Robinson (2013, Figure 1), who observed that promotion-related values such as achievement started decreasing at age 20 and only started increasing again after age 60. As expected, men tended to place greater emphasis on promotion values compared to women (Robinson, 2013;Schwartz & Rubel, 2005).…”
Section: The Pattern Of Values Development: Modeling Age and Gender Esupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, among older individuals, the search for new stimuli becomes less important due to their physical restrictions (Zuckerman, 1994), including general decline in strength, energy, and sharpness of the senses. In support of this notion, previous research has shown that elderly individuals give more importance to values related to upholding social norms but place less priority on values emphasizing sensation seeking, while the opposite holds for young individuals (Robinson, 2013;Schwartz, 2005;Tamayo, 1988).…”
Section: Value Change As a Function Of Agementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Confirming expectations, age had an influence on the absolute levels of the value clusters over time. Supporting recent crosssectional results (Gouveia et al, 2015;Robinson, 2013), older adults showed greater endorsement of Conservation and SelfTranscendence values as guiding principles in their lives, while placing less emphasis on Openness and SelfEnhancement values. (But age differences in the mean level of Self-Enhancement values were not as reliable as for the other value clusters in our sample; see Figure 3.)…”
Section: Mean-level Differences In Valuessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The study was based on a distinct values theory but clear relations between its six basic values and the four Schwartz value clusters can be identified (see, for example, Gouveia, 2003;Lima, 2012). 1 Similar to the findings reported by Robinson (2013), Gouveia et al (2015) found that Conservation-related values increase in importance in older age while Openness-related values decreased in importance. Importantly and extending past research, they also tested non-linear age effects.…”
Section: Rank-order Consistencies In Valuessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation