Value proposition test-driving for service innovation: how frontline employees innovate value propositions

Abstract

Purpose This article investigates the role of frontline employees in service innovation from a service-dominant logic perspective. Frontline employees lack a formal innovation obligation. Service innovation is a resource integration process resulting in the creation of new value propositions. Design/methodology/approach A case study of service innovation projects that includes three different businesses in the IT sector and personal interviews with 25 frontline employees. Findings The findings suggest that frontline employees contribute to service innovation by test-driving potential value propositions. Three types of value proposition test-driving have been identified: cognitive, practical, and discursive. The findings suggest interdependencies between the different modes of value proposition test-driving, as well as specific phases of the service innovation process dominated by one form or another. Research limitations/implications Value proposition test-driving offers a fruitful context for managers to involve frontline employees and use their creativity and expertise. The case study approach, however, limits the statistical generalizability of the findings. Originality/value The study is novel in that it (a) introduces the notion of value proposition test-driving for service innovation; (b) provides a systematic empirical analysis of how frontline employees contribute to service innovation by test-driving value propositions; (c) offers a service innovation model informed by the service-dominant logic; and (d) contributes to the service-dominant logic by detailing how service innovation occurs in practice.

Service excellence in the light of cultural diversity: the impact of metacognitive cultural intelligence

“…As the interface between customers and the organization, frontline employees are a key source of competitive advantage for service organizations. Not only are frontline employees the “face” of the organization, they are also responsible for innovations in service delivery and value co-creation (Åkesson et al , 2016). Intercultural service interactions carry far reaching implications for firms, employees, as well as customers, by offering both a unique challenge and an opportunity.…”

Mapping Value Co-creation Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis

“…This group of studies highlights the different fields that have contributed to the analysis of customer value co-creation in service innovation (Jaakkola et al, 2015;Chew, 2016;Joly et al, 2019). Starting from this multidisciplinarity, but always focused on service innovation, the documents included in the cluster have analyzed different issues: service experience co-creation (Jaakkola et al, 2015), the relationship between value co-creation and service evaluation (Foglieni and Holmlid, 2017), and the role of different stakeholders (Karlsson and Skalen, 2015;Akesson et al, 2016;Jonas et al, 2016;Jonas and Roth, 2017). Yu and Sangiorgi (2018) state that "Service design, as a human-centered and creative approach to service innovation, can reframe new service development processes to implement value co-creation."…”

“…All of these roles have been analyzed in recent years, because of their potential to affect firms' competitive advantage. Also, the phenomenon of value co-creation has extended to other stakeholders, to study their contribution to the innovation process (Akesson et al, 2016). Value co-creation related to technology and innovation management has expanded in several industries, with special intensity in services (tourism, health, and public services) but not exclusively.…”

Service with a conscience: moral dilemmas in customer service roles

“…Schepers et al (2012) found that a sense of moral responsibility for customer welfare has a stronger impact on service behavior under a low level of organizational control. Furthermore, co-creation of service is a critical characteristic of services (Åkesson et al , 2016; Galvagno and Dalli, 2014; Mustak et al , 2013; Vargo and Lusch, 2008; Verleye et al , 2016). Because the onus of value-creation moves from the producer to collaborative co-creation between parties, the producer-customer distinction becomes irrelevant.…”