2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These can also be found in governmental services. Due to transparencies promised by IT, an officer's discretions are taken away once the systems are installed with simplified rules that can be managed by automated processes [57]. Although the theme of discretion in government original was developed as part of the implementation of decisions [58], e-government literature has emphasized the potential of IT to decrease corruption and accommodate government services rather than policing and regulating types of government [59,60].…”
Section: Decreasing Bargaining and Discretion Of Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can also be found in governmental services. Due to transparencies promised by IT, an officer's discretions are taken away once the systems are installed with simplified rules that can be managed by automated processes [57]. Although the theme of discretion in government original was developed as part of the implementation of decisions [58], e-government literature has emphasized the potential of IT to decrease corruption and accommodate government services rather than policing and regulating types of government [59,60].…”
Section: Decreasing Bargaining and Discretion Of Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Det är viktiga och relevanta frågeställningar, inte minst mot bakgrund av att Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting förespråkar att införa automatisering i handläggningen av försörjningsstöd (Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting, 2019b; Wirtz, Weyerer & Geyer, 2018;Wirtz & Müller, 2019). Ett flertal studier stödjer resultat som visar att automatiserat beslutsfattande i offentliga förvaltningar ger ett mer neutralt beslutsfattande och minimerar risken för korruption (Wihlborg, Larsson & Hedström, 2016;Ranerup & Henriksen, 2019;Wenger & Wilkins, 2008;Cordella & Tempini, 2015). Emellertid har även utformandet av de algoritmer som det automatiserade beslutsfattandet ska bygga på studerats.…”
Section: Aktuellt Kunskapslägeunclassified
“…Intresset för digitalt automatiserat beslutsfattande inom socialtjänsten har ökat under slutet av 2010-talet. Inte minst introducerandet av roboten som en digital kollega i handläggningen av försörjningsstöd har väckt en rad nya frågor, farhågor och utvecklingsmöjligheter (Andersson, 2016;Ranerup & Henriksen, 2019;Lejon, 2019;Denk, Hedström & Karlsson, 2019;Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting, 2019a). Försörjningsstödet har kommit att fungera som det yttersta skyddsnätet i en universell välfärd med ambitionen att fånga upp och säkra levnadsnivån för de flesta i samhället.…”
Section: Introduktionunclassified
“…Public service is a service that is provided directly to people living within the jurisdiction (through the public sector) or through the financing of service. The term is associate with a social sensation (usually expressed through democratic elections) that certain services whatever the income, it should be available to everyone (Ranerup & Henriksen, 2019). A public service belongs to the government, and administrative agencies give to the people of the area and are considered essential to modern life.…”
Section: Definition Of a Good And Ethical Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%