Value Policy: Conceptual Interpretation of Research Practices

Vladimiovich, Bedrik Andrey; Pavlovich, Chernobrovkin Igor; Vladimirovich, Lubskiy Anatoliy; Grigoryevich, Volkov Yuriy; Vyalykh, Nikita A.

doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/87598

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, despite using different conceptual approaches to understanding the essence of values, scientists unanimously acknowledge their binary nature. Binarity manifests itself in the fact that value policy as a management activity can be carried out not only based on the current state of unconscious and conscious public values, but can also be intentionally transformed in the context of the dialogue between the state and society (Bedrik et al, 2016). That is social values are not limited to the public discourse, but they are mandatory requirements to the system of state management and maintenance of interaction in the society and thus have a positive meaning (Frolova et al, 2015).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, within the neoclassical model of state management value policy is seen as a special type of management which not only focuses on public values, but also creates public values as the foundation of efficient state management. This idea of value policy implies political subjectivity of state management actors to be a prerequisite of value policy (Bedrik et al, 2016).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the context of increasing international ethnic integration scientists began considering the paradigm of value policy as a tool for resolving interracial and interethnic conflicts, the United States being in the focus of research (Bureiko, 2013;Bedrik et al, 2016). Central methodological issues of studying interracial conflicts include: A typology of cultural values in developing multicultural society (Firat and Boyer, 2015;Jonason et al, 2015); issues of identity (Hanson, 2015); identifying the links between culture and development, between values, institutes and politics (Kim, 2013;Patacchini and Zenou, 2016); processes of cultural transmission (Kim, 2013); the state role in transformation of cultural values of race and ethnic relations (Song, 2014;Shomanov and Zhusupbekova, 2015); formation of social values related to intercultural compatibility (Sobieraja et al, 2013;Kostina et al, 2015).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Priorities of Value Policy in Race and Ethnic Relations in the USA

Volkov¹,

Degtyarev²,

Денисова³

et al. 2016

American Journal of Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conceptual interpretation of research practices undertaken in this study enabled the authors to identify the specific role of value policy as an efficiency factor of state management in improving race and ethnic relations in the United States. In this regard, the article aims to determine the priorities of value policy, considering the major trends of race relations development in the United States. The methodological basis for the research was formed by a sociological survey representing the formation of the system of core values in contemporary multicultural American society. Using the method of cluster analysis, the authors formed the matrix of social values differentiation according to their impact on race relations. The authors identified two types of values: Incentive values that facilitate improvement of race and ethnic relations and disincentive values which aggravate interracial conflicts. The authors defined and provided rationale for "high", "medium" and "low" influence levels of incentive values on race relations in contemporary American society. The article explains the necessity of subordinated development of disincentive values in contrast to incentive values in value policy related to race relations. Influence levels of incentive values were used to determine the priorities in modern value policy being a factor of social and economic security of the multicultural American society. The findings were processed into conceptual provisions, so that this concept can be used in managing race ethnic relations at the federal level.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Priorities of Value Policy in Race and Ethnic Relations in the USA

Volkov¹,

Degtyarev²,

Денисова³

et al. 2016

American Journal of Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Administrative and Social Consistency of the City Management Institution

Vodenko

Dyatlov

Kovalev

2020

Contributions to Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Archaizations in a Space of Sociocultural Transformation: A Theoretical Aspect

Sitnikov¹,

Levashov²,

Mareev³

2019

TAKSAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the analysis of social problems caused by the processes of archaization of contemporary Russian society. The relevance of the introduction of the concept of archaization into academic circulation as the socio-philosophical concept is that its terminological usage in the topical area of social philosophy may bring about solving a number of conceptual problems. Archaization is regarded in a space of sociocultural transformation which has been actively developing in Russian society in recent years. The authors suggest using a methodological construct for the assessment of the concept of archaization in the semantic center of which the process of the sociocultural interaction of Russian social actors is analyzed. Methodological construct is a tool of socio-philosophical analysis. Its purpose consists in identifying the essence, levels, and modes of manifestation and development of archaization in contemporary Russian society. The authors substantiate that archaization acts as a process of the sociocultural interaction the authors' methodological construct makes it possible to identify the levels of production (representation) of archaization.

show abstract

Value Policy: Conceptual Interpretation of Research Practices

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Priorities of Value Policy in Race and Ethnic Relations in the USA

Priorities of Value Policy in Race and Ethnic Relations in the USA

Administrative and Social Consistency of the City Management Institution

Archaizations in a Space of Sociocultural Transformation: A Theoretical Aspect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About