2017
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1305702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of inter-organizational collaboration in digital government projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their research, Luna-Reyes et al [32] identify different elements that influence public value creation: organizational factors and technologies directly affect public value creation, while institutional arrangements impact on technologies. Picazo-Vela et al [33] address the same theme from another perspective, i.e. the impact of publicprivate and public-public collaborations on public value creation in the e-Government context.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their research, Luna-Reyes et al [32] identify different elements that influence public value creation: organizational factors and technologies directly affect public value creation, while institutional arrangements impact on technologies. Picazo-Vela et al [33] address the same theme from another perspective, i.e. the impact of publicprivate and public-public collaborations on public value creation in the e-Government context.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the e-Government level of domain, the publications discuss mostly ( 16) the scenario of central public organizations [22,26,27,29,30,32,33,36,44] and just six articles present the local level [25,31,45,48], plus one that generally addresses the topic of smart cities [49].…”
Section: Papers Main Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resources per se are not sufficient to create innovations in public administrations. They remain potential sources of value if not sustained by organizational processes (Feldman and Quick, 2009; Picazo-Vela et al , 2018) and institutional reforms (Pina et al , 2010). Skilful knowledge management and learning processes appear as key capabilities to develop innovation in public administrations.…”
Section: Literature Review: Absorptive Capacity and It Governance Standards For Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, lab members' parent organizations are relevant, as lab members are expected to give feedback and communicate labs' results accordingly (Romero Frías and Machado 2018;Olejniczak et al 2020). Despite the labs' unorthodox nature, which may challenge traditional forms and means of bureaucratic decision making, their internal dynamics and effects on policy design as novel collaborative arrangements are rarely assessed when focusing on their role in the digital transformation of the public sector (see Williamson 2015b;Picazo-Vela et al 2018). However, digitalization labs may show features that differ from those more traditional policy labs, because they focus on issues emerging from the digital transformation of public sectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%