1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100025186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of conformation as an indicator of sheep carcass composition within and between breeds

Abstract: 1981). Value of conformation as an indicator of sheep carcass composition within and between breeds.ABSTRACT Carcass evaluation data from two breed-comparison trials were used to examine the value of conformation as an indicator of carcass composition when used in addition to carcass weight and different measures of fatness. One trial involved 1478 crossbred lambs out of three ewe types by Border Leicester, Dorset Down, Ile-de-France, North Country Cheviot, Oxford Down, Southdown, Suffolk, Texel and Wensleydal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
5

Year Published

1981
1981
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, in the current experiment, no overall effect of plane of nutrition on conformation was observed, when corrected to fat classification 3, there was a tendency (P , 0.1) for lambs fed the HP to have better carcass conformation. This shift towards better carcass conformation is due to increased carcass fat and tissue depth measurements as conformation is assessed on the basis of muscle and fat thickness in relation to skeletal size (Kempster et al, 1981).…”
Section: Table 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in the current experiment, no overall effect of plane of nutrition on conformation was observed, when corrected to fat classification 3, there was a tendency (P , 0.1) for lambs fed the HP to have better carcass conformation. This shift towards better carcass conformation is due to increased carcass fat and tissue depth measurements as conformation is assessed on the basis of muscle and fat thickness in relation to skeletal size (Kempster et al, 1981).…”
Section: Table 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horgan et al (1995), Wolf et al (1981) and Kempster et al (1981) found subjective conformation to be of limited value in predicting saleable and/or lean meat yield, in direct contrast to the work of Kirton et al (1992) and Jones et al (1993). An explanation for this discrepancy may be found in the populations of lambs evaluated in these studies: the more variance in lamb breed types and sizes used, the greater the value of subjective conformation score in predicting lean and/or saleable meat yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A relação músculo:osso, de acordo com Kempster et al (1981), é potencialmente a mais importante função de conTabela 3. Componentes da perna de caprinos em função dos níveis de inclusão do farelo grosso de trigo na dieta formação da carcaça.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified