Current zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL) control programs in Brazil include the culling of Leishmania infantum-infected reservoir dogs, a strategy that has failed to prevent a rise of canine and human ZVL cases over the past decade. One of the main reasons this strategy has failed is because of a long delay between sample collection, sample analysis, and control implementation. A rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tool would be highly desirable, because it would allow control interventions to be implemented in situ. We compared an immunochromatographic dipstick test to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and PCR for detecting L. infantum infections in dogs from an area of ZVL endemicity in Brazil. The dipstick test was shown to have 61 to 75% specificity and 72 to 77% sensitivity, compared to 100% specificity for both ELISA and PCR and 71 to 88% and 51 to 64% sensitivity for ELISA and PCR, respectively. Of the field samples tested, 92 of 175 (53%), 65 of 175 (37%), and 47 of 175 (27%) were positive by dipstick, ELISA, and PCR, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for the tested dipstick were 58 to 77% and 75%, respectively. Efforts should be made to develop a more specific dipstick test for diagnosis of leishmaniasis, because they may ultimately prove more cost-effective than currently used diagnostic tests when used in mass-screening surveys.Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are established reservoir hosts of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL) caused by Leishmania infantum. Hence, one of the approaches to reduce the incidence of human ZVL (also known as kala-azar) is to cull infected dogs. The impact of such dog-culling programs on incidence of human and canine ZVL has been doubted on both theoretical and practical grounds (10), and the results of controlled intervention trials are equivocal (3, 9). Despite the culling of an average of 19,500 dogs per year since 1989, the incidence of human ZVL in Brazil has increased steadily during the same period (26). One of the reasons why such control campaigns have failed is because of the long delay between sample collection, sample analysis, and control implementation (i.e., culling of infected dogs). This delay typically is 30 days long, but can be as long as 80 days, with infected dogs remaining infectious to sandfly vectors during this period and transmitting ZVL to susceptible dogs and humans. In a study in Brazil, it was shown that whereas a standard culling strategy implemented 80 days postsample collection resulted in only a 9% decrease in dog seroprevalence, culling implemented 7 days postsample collection resulted in a 27% decrease in seroprevalence (6). Current diagnostic methods used for Leishmania mass-screening surveys (mainly enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], immunofluorescence antibody test, or direct agglutination test) lack sensitivity or specificity, require technological expertise and specialized laboratory equipment, and can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Hence, a rapid, sensitive and specifi...