2010
DOI: 10.1080/16522354.2010.11073514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value Networks and Changing Business Models for the Digital Television Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the considerable sunk costs in platform development and content acquisition, the market tends towards fierce competition and monopoly structures. However, as [40] argues, exclusive rights purchase reflects the one-sided merchant mode and leaves no opportunities for a multiplatform strategy as other parties are denied access to crowd-pulling supply. Value creation in broadcasting markets is changing as content is progressively being rented through licensed access rather than being bought by platform operators.…”
Section: Non-exclusivity In Broadcasting Platformsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Owing to the considerable sunk costs in platform development and content acquisition, the market tends towards fierce competition and monopoly structures. However, as [40] argues, exclusive rights purchase reflects the one-sided merchant mode and leaves no opportunities for a multiplatform strategy as other parties are denied access to crowd-pulling supply. Value creation in broadcasting markets is changing as content is progressively being rented through licensed access rather than being bought by platform operators.…”
Section: Non-exclusivity In Broadcasting Platformsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This business model opposes to the two-sided platform model that allows affiliated sellers to sell directly to affiliated buyers. Consider video on demand applications such as YouTube, whereby content is provided to the platform and income is shared among the content provider and the platform owner [18]. As [17] argues, "two-sidedness is not a 0-1 notion: rather, there is a continuum of forms of intermediation".…”
Section: Network Externalities In Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it is impossible to accurately predict tomorrow's business model for TV broadcasting and distribution, there is, however, little doubt that the future value creation models in digital TV will fundamentally differ from those applied in analogue industries (Evens, 2010). Hence, the article focuses on the fundamental organisational change that the TV industry witnesses following the popularity of online video services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have also directly explored the relationship between television, new media, and the Internet (Palmer, 2006;Vukanovic, 2009;Doyle, 2010;Evens, 2010;Gunter, 2010) and their implications for media management (Anderson, 2006;Ulin, 2013;Voguel, 2014;Doyle, 2015). Previous studies about the evolution of consumption habits are important for the purposes of this study (Evans, 2011 In the case of Spain, such issues have been addressed from a number of research perspectives including the interrelationships between television, convergence, business models, and new technologies (Arrojo, 2010 As a reading of the relevant academic literature reveals, not only have the interconnected multiplatform environment and digitalization had an impact on audience viewing habits, they have also had a profound impact on the audiovisual industry itself in terms of its production and distribution processes (Doyle, 2016), as well as on the business models that underpin it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%