2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4193583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value chain transformations in the transition to a sustainable bioeconomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investments However, the current success of domestic companies does not preclude future competition or acquisitions by large foreign corporations, which may lead to market concentration. Acceleration in the rate of bioeconomy innovation is associated with more vertically coordinated value chains, bigger companies with higher market shares, increasing knowledge-sharing among value chain members, and a leading role of firms with core research capabilities [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Investments However, the current success of domestic companies does not preclude future competition or acquisitions by large foreign corporations, which may lead to market concentration. Acceleration in the rate of bioeconomy innovation is associated with more vertically coordinated value chains, bigger companies with higher market shares, increasing knowledge-sharing among value chain members, and a leading role of firms with core research capabilities [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of domestic industrial clusters can benefit from government support to private ventures to improve technological transformation [36][37][38]. Policies can also increase the distributional effects of bio-based innovation among value chain members and prevent market concentration [14,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, also in Cluster 3, there seem to be at least two types of companies, depending on the technological level. One explanation for the intra-cluster diversity could be what Mac Clay and Sellare [27] described as different stages of value chain upgrading, with different levels of biomass use, technological innovation, investments, risks, cooperation, and knowledge-sharing. Some companies of each cluster might be more advanced in the upgrading process than others, leading to different characteristics and also, to different economic and environmental outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value chain approach to differentiate bioeconomic types and a potential upgrading process is proposed by Mac Clay and Sellare [27]. The authors distinguish six value chain models with different characteristics of biomass and biotechnology use and innovation processes.…”
Section: Biotechnological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%