2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00002302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value and Perspectives of Proton Radiation Therapy for Limited Stage Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Despite relatively short follow-up times it seems justified to conclude that proton beam irradiation of prostate cancer can improve bNED rates by 10% and decrease Grade 2 late effects by more than 10%. There were no Grade 3 and 4 late effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In radiation therapy major improvements have been made by the introduction of 3-D conformal therapy techniques especially for prostate cancer [9,12,20]. Many critical parameters have been examined e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In radiation therapy major improvements have been made by the introduction of 3-D conformal therapy techniques especially for prostate cancer [9,12,20]. Many critical parameters have been examined e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of fractionated proton radiation treatment technique and the delivery system employed at our institution have been published previously [24,25]. In brief, all patients underwent thin-cut CT scan of the brain, 512 ϫ 512 matrix, with intravenous contrast.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows Grade 2 or worse GI and GU morbidity rates after treatment for prostate cancer using modern RT techniques with conventional fractionation or hypofractionation, and C-ion RT has less risk, especially of developing rectal bleeding compared with other RT methods. 30,[42][43][44][45][46][47] These results show that the feasibility of further hypofractionated C-ion RT with 16 fractions is confirmed and that our assumption of RBE of carbon ions and the equivalent dose calculated by the L/Q model are possibly reasonable, even in the case of C-ion RT for prostate cancer, although follow-up times for 63.0 GyE/20 Fr and 57.6 GyE/16 Fr groups seem to be shorter than that for the 66 GyE/20 Fr group.…”
Section: Incidence Of Late Morbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%