Since 2017, Indonesian upstream oil and gas business is managed using the Gross Split PSC scheme to replace the old scheme, namely Cost Recovery PSC. The reason behind this is because the amount of cost recovery exceeds the total profit sharing from state oil and gas revenues. However, it turns out that the Gross Split PSC scheme is less attractive to oil and gas contractors as in the Gross Split PSC scheme the contractor's total profit sharing drops significantly. As the result, in 2020 the Government reverted to the Cost Recovery PSC scheme to give oil and gas contractors a choice of using the PSC scheme. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the proportion of oil and gas production sharing between the Government and Oil and Gas Contractors through the Cost Recovery PSC scheme and the Gross Split PSC scheme. In the analysis of this issue, has been used the production data belonging to one of the Oil and Gas Contractors, namely BUT (Permanent Establishment) ABC Ltd.. This study is a qualitative study to get an in-depth picture of the phenomenon of the proportion of share of oil and gas production between the Government and the Oil and Gas Contractor through Cost Recovery PSC scheme and Gross Split PSC scheme. The data is collected through literature studies and field studies by conducting interviews with relevant stakeholders. The result of this study indicates that in the Gross Split PSC scheme the contractor gets a smaller profit share when compared to the Cost Recovery PSC scheme as in the Gross Split PSC scheme there is no return of operating costs as contained in the Cost Recovery PSC scheme.