2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3950357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valorization of Olive Pruning Residues through Bioconversion into Edible Mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. Ex Fr.) P. Kumm. (1871) of Improved Nutritional Value

Abstract: In several Mediterranean countries, olive pruning residues (OLPRs) are abandoned or burned leading to several environmental problems. Valorization of these agrowastes could be a challenge for the primary decomposer Pleurotus ostreatus, turning them into edible biomass. The OLPR was used alone (OLPR), or in mixtures with wheat straw (WS : OLPR 1 : 3 v/v and WS : OLPR 3 : 1 v/v). Mycelial colonization was hastened by 3.7 days in WS : OLPR 1 : 3 (v/v). Yields were comparable to control (WS) in WS : OLPR 3 : 1 (v/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substrates S4 and S5 weren't fully colonized by the mycelium, they only attained a level of 50% mycelial colonization (MC). Early findings showed the possibility of gaining production from mixing high proportions of SCG or OLPR (67%) with low proportion of WS (33%) [17,18]. However, in this study, when both tested wastes (SCG and OLPR) formed together 83% of substrate, the C/N ratio was strongly reduced (26:1 and 37:1 respectively in S4 and S5, compared to 69:1 in WS) (Table 1), assumedly causing a negative effect on mycelia run.…”
Section: Substrate Effect On Mushroom Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Substrates S4 and S5 weren't fully colonized by the mycelium, they only attained a level of 50% mycelial colonization (MC). Early findings showed the possibility of gaining production from mixing high proportions of SCG or OLPR (67%) with low proportion of WS (33%) [17,18]. However, in this study, when both tested wastes (SCG and OLPR) formed together 83% of substrate, the C/N ratio was strongly reduced (26:1 and 37:1 respectively in S4 and S5, compared to 69:1 in WS) (Table 1), assumedly causing a negative effect on mycelia run.…”
Section: Substrate Effect On Mushroom Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mushroom capacity to absorb chemical compounds from the used substrate and the correlation between mushroom's and substrate's chemical composition has been demonstrated in a number of early reports [14,[20][21][22][23]. For instance, Abou Fayssal et al [17] and Alsanad et al [18] tested the potential of using abandoned OLPR or SCG on the production and nutritional value of P. ostreatus production, and demonstrated a direct impact of the substrate composition on the mushroom's fatty acids profile. However, the combined use of both types of agro-industrial residues (OLPR and SCG) in P. ostreatus growth substrate is not reported yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mushrooms grow on agricultural wastes by secreting enzymes to digest the surrounding foodstuffs and get their nutrients from the substrate 44 . Therefore, their nutritional composition will largely depend on the chemical composition of the growing substrate [7][8][9][10][11][12] . In early studies, the changes in mushroom nutritional composition were mostly addressed when various nutrient additives were applied at spawning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mushroom nutrient composition is affected by the substrate composition and properties (El Sebaaly et al 2018 , 2019 ; Abou Fayssal et al 2020 ). The mushroom nutritional value may be improved as by applying nano-amino at spawning; proteins increase with the highest dose used, and essential amino acids with the lowest one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%