“…From the obtained results, it can be seen that TDCW production was almost equivalent, irrespective of the trial perform on glucose or glycerol, since, in both instances, Xmax concentration was achieved c. 330-360 h after inoculation, presenting similar values (≈13.5 g/L) for both trials (Figure 1a). Equally, the substrate assimilation rate was almost the same for the two substrates employed as carbon sources, in disagreement with most literature reports [3,29,[42][43][44][45] that indicate that for most higher (e.g., Ascomycetes / Basidiomycetes) or lower (e.g., Zygomycetes) fungi, glucose is considered by far to be a more adequate carbon source compared to glycerol, due to the poor regulation of the enzymes implicated in the uptake of glycerol by these very microorganisms [29,43,44]. Moreover, it was with interest that, in the present investigation, significantly higher lipid production was observed to occur in the trial performed on glycerol (Lmax = 8.4 g/L, simultaneous lipid in TDCW = 62.7% w/w), compared to the experiment performed on glucose (Lmax = 7.0 g/L, simultaneous lipid in TDCW =51.4% w/w), demonstrating, once Moreover, it was with interest that, in the present investigation, significantly higher lipid production was observed to occur in the trial performed on glycerol (L max = 8.4 g/L, simultaneous lipid in TDCW = 62.7% w/w), compared to the experiment performed on glucose (L max = 7.0 g/L, simultaneous lipid in TDCW =51.4% w/w), demonstrating, once more, the suitability of glycerol as the implicated substrate in the conversions performed by C. elegans.…”