2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(02)76739-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valor pronóstico de los estudios de perfusión miocárdica con Tl-201 normal en pacientes con ergometría positiva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among patients undergoing stress echocardiography, McCully et al [19] examined 1,325 patients with no known heart disease and a normal exercise echocardiogram during a mean follow-up of 2 years for a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and cardiac events. The authors found that none of the traditional CAD risk factors were associated with a worse outcome However in the prior literature assessing the normal SPECT study and positive coronary angiography, those with 0-1 CAD risk factors had an excellent long-term prognosis, those with multiple risk factors had a worse prognosis and must be considered at being at intermediate risk[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. When taken individually, only diabetes, smoking, and hypertension were associated with an increase in mortality, but family history and a history of hyperlipidemia were not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients undergoing stress echocardiography, McCully et al [19] examined 1,325 patients with no known heart disease and a normal exercise echocardiogram during a mean follow-up of 2 years for a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and cardiac events. The authors found that none of the traditional CAD risk factors were associated with a worse outcome However in the prior literature assessing the normal SPECT study and positive coronary angiography, those with 0-1 CAD risk factors had an excellent long-term prognosis, those with multiple risk factors had a worse prognosis and must be considered at being at intermediate risk[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. When taken individually, only diabetes, smoking, and hypertension were associated with an increase in mortality, but family history and a history of hyperlipidemia were not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%