1982
DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Rokeach Value Survey

Abstract: The study evaluated the construct validity of the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS). Rokeach has presented factor analytic evidence that his instrument has the theorized dimensions. However, his results were based on analysis of ipsative data, and therefore, must be cautiously interpreted. The subjects in this study provided ratings of the values employed on the RVS, or normative data, which may be more suitable for factor analytic investigations. The outcomes suggest that the validity of the RVS is to some extent si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural values can be measures as for each dimension two extreme value are specified and each countries cultural value can be measured accordingly. To illustrate, Rokeach value survey (Thompson, 1982), Schwartz's cultural value dimension (Schwarts, 1999) have developed frameworks to explore the different components of culture. The two most recognized theory of culture are developed by Hofstede (1994) and Schwartz (2001).…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural values can be measures as for each dimension two extreme value are specified and each countries cultural value can be measured accordingly. To illustrate, Rokeach value survey (Thompson, 1982), Schwartz's cultural value dimension (Schwarts, 1999) have developed frameworks to explore the different components of culture. The two most recognized theory of culture are developed by Hofstede (1994) and Schwartz (2001).…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educators tried various ways in analyzing cultures, examples included Bond's Chinese Value Survey (Bond 1988), the Rokeach Value Survey (Thompson 1982) and various others (Robert and Bayacigiller 1984). However, one of the most widely use method is still the cultural dimensions created by Geert Hofstede around the early 1980s (Allan 2002;Dimmock 1998;Paulus et al 2005;Yates and Cutler 1996).…”
Section: Hofstede's Cultural Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction of ipsative versus normative scored scales has long been recognized by methodologists (e.g., Cattell, 1944;Clemans, 1966;Gorsuch, 1974;Hicks, 1970;Kerlinger, 1973), and the benefits and limitations of each continue to be discussed in the literature of various areas of psychological inquiry including animal learning (e.g., Hurwitz & Davis, 1983), personal values and attributions (e.g., Maruyama, 1982;Thompson, Levitov, & Miederhoff, 1982), educational psychology (e.g., Merritt & Marshall, 1984 Stones & Webster, 1984), clinical psychology (e.g., Cooper & Kline, 1982;Fischer & Turner, 1978;Tornlin, et al, 1984), and personnel psychology (Johnson, Wood, & Blinkhorn, 1988;Saville & Willson, 1991;Tenopyr, 1988).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%