2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of students’ evaluations of teaching: Biasing effects of likability and prior subject interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some teacher doubted the results of students' evaluation in the end of semester. Previous study that likability bears no conceptual relationship to teaching quality, these finding point to a compromised validity of students' evaluation (Feistauer and Richter, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some teacher doubted the results of students' evaluation in the end of semester. Previous study that likability bears no conceptual relationship to teaching quality, these finding point to a compromised validity of students' evaluation (Feistauer and Richter, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…That SETs are affected by strong biasing effects of how likeable students find a teacher and by weak biasing effects of how strongly there are interested in the course subject. It seem to reflect likability but not teaching quality (Feistauer and Richter, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We postulate the following two hypotheses to this result: One has to do with the behavior of the professors in classes, as generally, students expect their professors to behave according to their stereotypes ( Anderson and Smith, 2005 ; Kombe et al, 2019 ) and if these expectations are not met, the students may hold the professors accountable in the final evaluations ( Dalmia et al, 2005 ; Kayas et al, 2020 ; Sprague & Massoni, 2005 ). Also, the likability of the professors can have a strong effect on the SET outcomes ( Feistauer and Richter, 2018 ) The second possible explanation is that students may have an ingrained cultural mindset that, despite the equal competencies of men and women, they tend to see a male professor as slightly more recommendable than the female counterpart. Several studies show that gender bias is learned in childhood, and it can be passed on as a belief system through family and school or can be transferred generation after generation through media ( Atwood, 2001 ; Newall et al, 2018 ; Rajan and Morgan, 2018 ; Singh, 2017 ; Shor, van de Rijt and Fotouhi, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings led the authors to conclude “student emphases on empathy, relationships, caring, and understanding underscore the need for marketing educators to maintain personal interactions with students” (Faranda & Clarke, 2004, p. 280). Based on established pedagogical models, instructor likability/concern positively affects perceived learning (Abrantes et al, 2007; Feistauer & Richter, 2018). Indeed, in order for actual learning to occur, students have to feel cared for by the instructor.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in order for actual learning to occur, students have to feel cared for by the instructor. Since people buy from people they like, the steps of the sales process facilitate the prospect’s likability of the salesperson and similarly will strengthen the effect of likability/concern on perceived learning, which in turn leads to actual learning (Alexander & Murphy, 1998; Feistauer & Richter, 2018). Therefore, we propose:…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%