Validity of Principal Diagnoses in Discharge Summaries and ICD-10 Coding Assessments Based on National Health Data of Thailand

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the validity of the principal diagnoses on discharge summaries and coding assessments.MethodsData were collected from the National Health Security Office (NHSO) of Thailand in 2015. In total, 118,971 medical records were audited. The sample was drawn from government hospitals and private hospitals covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand. Hospitals and cases were selected using NHSO criteria. The validity of the principal diagnoses listed in the “Summary and Coding Assessment” forms was established by comparing data from the discharge summaries with data obtained from medical record reviews, and additionally, by comparing data from the coding assessments with data in the computerized ICD (the data base used for reimbursement-purposes).ResultsThe summary assessments had low sensitivities (7.3%–37.9%), high specificities (97.2%–99.8%), low positive predictive values (9.2%–60.7%), and high negative predictive values (95.9%–99.3%). The coding assessments had low sensitivities (31.1%–69.4%), high specificities (99.0%–99.9%), moderate positive predictive values (43.8%–89.0%), and high negative predictive values (97.3%–99.5%). The discharge summaries and codings often contained mistakes, particularly the categories “Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases”, “Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified”, “Factors influencing health status and contact with health services”, and “Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes”.ConclusionsThe validity of the principal diagnoses on the summary and coding assessment forms was found to be low. The training of physicians and coders must be strengthened to improve the validity of discharge summaries and codings.

The epidemiology of Guillain‐Barré syndrome in Thailand over 13 years (2005‐2017): A nationwide population‐based retrospective cohort study

“…The study of validity of principle diagnoses from NHSO database in 2015 showed the level of agreement comparison of the codes for principle diagnoses given in the discharge summaries with the computerized ICD-10 codes in category "Disease of the nervous system" was 56.7%. 26 The third limitation was that diagnosis relied on ICD10 codes, which may have led to miscoding or misclassification bias. Our study's main strengths were that it was the first to estimate the incidence rate of GBS in Thailand using data from a nationwide administrative database and that our findings provide an overall background of GBS epidemiology.…”

Discovery of Association Rules Patterns and Prevalence of Comorbidities in Adult Patients Hospitalized with Mental and Behavioral Disorders

“…For discharged patients, the principal diagnosis refers to the final diagnosis confirmed after examination to diagnose the disease. It is the most important disease that requires a doctor's visit or treatment [19,20]. Sometimes, a new disease, not related to this, is discovered, and the additional disease that requires a lot of medical resources is selected as the principal diagnosis [19,20].…”

“…It is the most important disease that requires a doctor's visit or treatment [19,20]. Sometimes, a new disease, not related to this, is discovered, and the additional disease that requires a lot of medical resources is selected as the principal diagnosis [19,20]. Therefore, the principal diagnosis is an important medical condition that must be registered during hospitalization [21].…”

Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Evaluate the Prognostic Accuracy of SIRS and qSOFA

“…We selected encounters using ICD-9 codes. However, these codes have been criticized in the literature due to lack of clear definitions [ 26 27 ]. Future studies are needed that overcome this limitation by using more precise methods of identifying patients at risk for sepsis.…”