2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01983.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of noncycloplegic refraction in the assessment of refractive errors: the Tehran Eye Study

Abstract: ABSTRACT.Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of noncycloplegic autorefraction for determining refractive status compared to cycloplegic autorefraction. Methods: The target population was noninstitutionalized citizens of all ages, residing in Tehran in 2002, selected through stratified cluster sampling. From 6497 eligible residents, 70.3% participated in the study, from August to November 2002. Here, we report data on 3501 people over the age of 5 years who had autorefraction with and without … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
88
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
21
88
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study performed on young adults, significant differences were found between the cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction values (7) . Thus, cycloplegic refraction examinations provided more reliable results in all age groups (17,19) . Recent developments in imaging techniques allow the clinician to quantitatively calculate anterior segment parameters, such as keratometry, CCT, ACD, ACV, and ACA (5,20) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study performed on young adults, significant differences were found between the cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction values (7) . Thus, cycloplegic refraction examinations provided more reliable results in all age groups (17,19) . Recent developments in imaging techniques allow the clinician to quantitatively calculate anterior segment parameters, such as keratometry, CCT, ACD, ACV, and ACA (5,20) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age of the cycloplegia group (Group 1, n=25) was 23.04 ± 3.42 years (range, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], while the mean age of the control group (Group 2, n=24) was 22.4 ± 2.05 years (range, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age or sex distribution (P=0.259 and P=0.878, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be some degree of overestimation of myopia, particularly in the younger age group, because the refraction was measured without cycloplegia. 38,39 Moreover, the response rate is approximately 60%. There may be a greater tendency toward less study participation in individuals with a low socioeconomic status because of the lack of interest or suspicion, as well as among highly educated individuals because of a potentially higher workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The mean noncycloplegic SE of 16-to 45-yearold subjects was estimated to be approximately 0.4 D more myopic than their cycloplegic SE. 31 In addition, the myopia may continue to progress after the age of 18 years in some subjects. 32,33 Second, there was undersampling in some age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%