2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of maternal report on birth weight 11 years after delivery: the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was chosen in order to make it easier to collect data and administer the data collection . 40 However, when stratifying birth weight information, the authors found that reported information tended to be overestimated in the case of LBW children and underestimated in the case of HBW children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was chosen in order to make it easier to collect data and administer the data collection . 40 However, when stratifying birth weight information, the authors found that reported information tended to be overestimated in the case of LBW children and underestimated in the case of HBW children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers with small children overestimated the birthweights while mothers of bigger children underestimated their birthweights. Mothers living without a partner and mothers with low levels of education provided less precise data on their children's birthweights 16 . In some other Latin American countries reports have shown that inaccuracies arise when women report weights for children who were never weighed, or confuse the weight at a postpartum check‐up with the birthweight 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saúde Pública 2017; 33 (7):e00051816 ao nascer inferior a 3.500g tenderam a superestimá-lo na entrevista, enquanto mães de crianças com peso igual ou superior a 3.500g tenderam a subestimá-lo. A diferença média do peso ao nascer dessas duas fontes de informação foi de apenas 20g 7 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Estudos epidemiológicos no ciclo da vida preferencialmente usam informações prospectivas do peso ao nascer, entretanto dados retrospectivos são mais facilmente obtidos, permitindo análises mais rápidas 7 . Sendo assim, diferentes fontes de dados secundários vêm sendo utilizadas, seja com base em registros de nascimento e de acompanhamento de crianças na infância ou prontuários médicos, seja de forma recordatória, dependente, portanto, da memória do indivíduo entrevistado 8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation