2002
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Controlled Clinical Trials of Psychotherapy: Findings From the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

Abstract: Relying on brand names of therapy can be misleading. These findings suggest that the basic premise of controlled clinical trials (i.e., that the compared interventions represent separate and distinct treatments) may not have been met in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. The implications of these findings for using controlled clinical trials to study psychotherapy are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
216
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
216
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, our finding that Ms. M's CMT most closely adhered to the full CBT prototype runs parallel to Ablon and Jones' (2002) finding that interpersonal psychotherapies also most closely adhered to the full CBT prototype. Similarly, our finding that adherence to the full CBT prototype predicted estimated symptom change in this CMT treatment is reminiscent of Ablon and Jones' (1998) finding that adherence to the full PDT prototype was associated with favorable outcomes in CBTs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For example, our finding that Ms. M's CMT most closely adhered to the full CBT prototype runs parallel to Ablon and Jones' (2002) finding that interpersonal psychotherapies also most closely adhered to the full CBT prototype. Similarly, our finding that adherence to the full CBT prototype predicted estimated symptom change in this CMT treatment is reminiscent of Ablon and Jones' (1998) finding that adherence to the full PDT prototype was associated with favorable outcomes in CBTs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Even if the program designs of many types of psychotherapy are standardized, they are subjective, depending on their investigator, due to their manualized treatment design. [72] Previous studies showed that the therapeutic modality of some types of CBT seem more similar to that of BT, or vice versa. The inconsistency of the methodology is also caused by the number of therapists (one or many), the number of sessions performed, or the type of therapy (e.g., individual therapy or group therapy).…”
Section: Variable Methodology Of the Brain Function For Psychotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En un estudio utilizando el Psychotherapy Process Q-set (Ablon & Jones, 2002), Goodman (2013) mostró que los prototipos para la Psicoterapia focalizada en la transferencia (TFT) mantienen una correlación con el prototipo de la psicoterapia psicodinámica; que el prototipo para la Terapia dialéctica comportamental (TDC) se correlaciona con el prototipo de la terapia cognitiva conductual (TCC) y que el prototipo de tratamiento basado en la mentalización (proceso funcional reflexivo) se relaciona tanto con TFT y TDC. Particularmente, el prototipo del TFT contenía ítems mentalizantes enfocados en la mentalización del paciente sobre el terapeuta o de otras relaciones, mientras que los elementos de mentalización del prototipo de TDC se enfoca en la mentalización de los pacientes sobre sí mismos, quizá en línea con la práctica de la mentalización en la TDC.…”
Section: Mentalizando En La Mediación De La Efectividad De La Psicoteunclassified