Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Estimation Fat-Free Mass in the Army Cadets

Abstract

Background: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a fast, practical, non-invasive, and frequently used method for fat-free mass (FFM) estimation. The aims of this study were to validate predictive equations of BIA to FFM estimation in Army cadets and to develop and validate a specific BIA equation for this population. Methods: A total of 396 males, Brazilian Army cadets, aged 17–24 years were included. The study used eight published predictive BIA equations, a specific equation in FFM estimation, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Student’s t-test (for paired sample), linear regression analysis, and Bland–Altman method were used to test the validity of the BIA equations. Results: Predictive BIA equations showed significant differences in FFM compared to DXA (p < 0.05) and large limits of agreement by Bland–Altman. Predictive BIA equations explained 68% to 88% of FFM variance. Specific BIA equations showed no significant differences in FFM, compared to DXA values. Conclusion: Published BIA predictive equations showed poor accuracy in this sample. The specific BIA equations, developed in this study, demonstrated validity for this sample, although should be used with caution in samples with a large range of FFM.

Diet Macronutrient Composition, Physical Activity, and Body Composition in Soldiers During 6 Months Deployment

“…Bioimpedance analysis is based on fluid content of the body and despite the controlled measurements, results can be inaccurate, particularly, on the individual level. Fat free mass estimated via bioimpedance has been reported to have poor accuracy compared to DXA (25).…”

Development of equations and proposed reference values to estimate body fat mass among Chilean children and adolescents

“…1 Measuring fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) is particularly interesting in the assessment of nutritional status among children, adolescents, and adults.…”

Comparison of Anthropometric Measures in US Military Personnel in the Classification of Overweight and Obesity

“…First, BIA was used as the criterion measure to assess BF% in participants rather than dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). Although DEA is currently considered the gold standard for assessing body composition , BIA is often favored clinically to assess adiposity because it is less expensive, more portable, and less time consuming than DXA . Some studies have also reported BIA to have good reliability and predictive value compared with DXA , which suggests it may be a more practical criterion measure than DXA for research purposes.…”