Validity of analogical predictions

Klein, Gary

doi:10.1016/0040-1625(86)90016-8

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each new aircraft involved a variety of subsystems, and so hundreds of these studies have been conducted by the Air Force. Subsequent research (Klein, 1986) has demonstrated the validity and reliability of these methods.…”

Section: Predicting By Analogymentioning

confidence: 97%

Applications of Analogical Reasoning

Klein¹

1987

Metaphor and Symbolic Activity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Predicting By Analogymentioning

confidence: 97%

Applications of Analogical Reasoning

Klein¹

1987

Metaphor and Symbolic Activity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Third, in human factors, a successful and relevant area of research is naturalistic decision making (NDM). It focuses on the attempt to describe and understand how people make decisions in context, within the constraints of the real world (Klein, 1986). The NDM perspective is often viewed as a contrast to other perspectives on decision making, including JDM and traditional economics (Lipshitz, Klein, Orasanu, & Salas, 2001), because it emerged from the need to address features of naturalistic contexts such as ill-defined goals, time pressure, high cognitive workload, and many other issues of experts’ decision making.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Trends in Decision-Making Research

González

Meyer

2016

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trends in Decision Making Research

González

Meyer

Klein³

et al. 2013

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognitive engineering and decision making has become central to current human factors and ergonomics research and practice. This trend parallels exciting developments in decision making research in general. Experimental economics and judgment and decision making research boom academically and gain much public attention, while theories and economic models of individual choice are expanding and gaining recognition in applications and practical solutions to real-world problems. This symposium brings together three leading figures in different traditions of research in decision making: Gary Klein represents the naturalistic decision making approach. Frank Yates represents research on behavioral decision making and heuristics and biases. Alvin E. Roth, the 2012 Noble laureate for economics, represents game theory and market design applications in economics. The invited speakers will present their views of the different research traditions in decision making and they will provide some thoughts on the trends and possible future developments of research, which we hope will provoke new ideas and discussions in Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making in HFES.

show abstract

Validity of analogical predictions

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

Applications of Analogical Reasoning

Applications of Analogical Reasoning

Integrating Trends in Decision-Making Research

Trends in Decision Making Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About