2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit–stand transfers and step-up transfers: Comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system*

Abstract: An inertial measurement unit (IMU) allows kinematic evaluation of human motion with fewer operational constraints than a gold standard optoelectronic motion capture (MOCAP) system. The study's aim was to compare IMU and MOCAP measurements of dynamic pelvic orientation angles during different activities of daily life (ADL): gait, sit-to-stand (STS) transfers and block step-up (BS) transfers. A single IMU was attached onto the lower back in seventeen healthy participants (8F/9 M, age 19-31 years; BMI < 25) and o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(82 reference statements)
9
96
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a classic way [37][38][39], we have previously used Bland and Altman's method to evaluate the agreement between DYSKIMOT and Elite [40]. It appeared that the Bland and Altman's plots did not show a trend with the mean values of the measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a classic way [37][38][39], we have previously used Bland and Altman's method to evaluate the agreement between DYSKIMOT and Elite [40]. It appeared that the Bland and Altman's plots did not show a trend with the mean values of the measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily activity will be measured over 7 days with tri-axial accelerometers [39, 40]. Two performance-based measures, the 6-minute walk test [41, 42] and sit to stand on 30 s [4345] will be assessed to measure Physical function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor fusion algorithms provide the sensor interaction and complementary information (El-Gohary and McNames, 2012). IMUs are employed in many applications, such as timed-up and go tests (Coulthard et al, 2015), sit-stand and step-up transfer tests (Bolink et al, 2016), evaluation of kinematics and the capacity of post-stroke patients to grasp objects (Braidot et al, 2013). However, it presents high sensitivity with magnetic field interferences and need frequent calibration (El-Gohary and McNames, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%