2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0036-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument

Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper was to report tests of the validity and reliability of a new instrument, the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D, which was constructed to improve the evaluation of health services that have an impact upon the psychosocial aspects of the quality of life.MethodsAustralian and US data from a large multi-instrument comparison survey were used to conduct tests of convergent, predictive and content validity using as comparators five other multi-attribute utility (MAU) instrume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
363
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
4
363
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The scores from each dimension are combined to create a final AQoL-8D utilities score for use in economic evaluation studies. The AQoL-8D has good validity and internal consistency with alpha coefficients of 0.89-0.96 [38].…”
Section: Aqol-8dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores from each dimension are combined to create a final AQoL-8D utilities score for use in economic evaluation studies. The AQoL-8D has good validity and internal consistency with alpha coefficients of 0.89-0.96 [38].…”
Section: Aqol-8dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline assessments included fasted blood samples, weight, height, waist circumference and blood pressure, and questionnaires included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) [35], Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D scale (primary outcomes) [36]; Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) [37], Simple Dietary Questionnaire (SDQ), Mediterranean diet questionnaire [38] and shopping and budgeting questionnaire. A background questionnaire measured potential covariates: age, gender, socio-economic status, education level (1 = completed primary school; 8 = postgraduate degree), household income, sedentary time and physical activity (each calculated as total minutes per week), sleeping difficulties (how many hours sleep on average on weeknights and weekends; and whether or not they consider sleep to be a problem -yes/no/don't know), smoking status (1 = never smoked; 5 = smoke daily), and frequency of consuming >2 alcoholic drinks per day (1 = never/rarely; 5 = daily).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain available patient reported measures do consider aspects of capacity, including self-efficacy and the intrusion of illness on everyday life 26 or the effects of disabilities such as visual or hearing impairments. 27 Capacity influences health and vice versa. In a recent systematic review, supporting patient capacity in interventions was associated with greater effectiveness in reducing 30-day hospital readmissions.…”
Section: Patient Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%