2016
DOI: 10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.2.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Korean version of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised for Korean Hospital Nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 30 Authors utilized this scale in 169 registered nurses and 37 physicians to demonstrate its reliability and construct validity. As the first generic instrument of MD for healthcare professionals, moral distress scale - revised (MDS-R) has 3 parallel versions for nurses, physicians, and other health care providers, and has also been extensively utilized by other subsequent survey or comparative studies, 42 - 44 as well as been extensively validated in other countries including Turkey, 45 Italy, 32 , 46 Australia, 47 China, 48 Korea, 49 Brazil, 50 Sweden, 51 and Iran. 52 , 53 To date, the MDS-R has 6 versions, designed for different healthcare provider populations: adult-nurse, adult-physician, adult-other, pediatric-nurse, pediatric-physician, and pediatric-other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 Authors utilized this scale in 169 registered nurses and 37 physicians to demonstrate its reliability and construct validity. As the first generic instrument of MD for healthcare professionals, moral distress scale - revised (MDS-R) has 3 parallel versions for nurses, physicians, and other health care providers, and has also been extensively utilized by other subsequent survey or comparative studies, 42 - 44 as well as been extensively validated in other countries including Turkey, 45 Italy, 32 , 46 Australia, 47 China, 48 Korea, 49 Brazil, 50 Sweden, 51 and Iran. 52 , 53 To date, the MDS-R has 6 versions, designed for different healthcare provider populations: adult-nurse, adult-physician, adult-other, pediatric-nurse, pediatric-physician, and pediatric-other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of these findings, Chae et al 23 found five factors (e.g. futile care, nursing practice, the institutional and contextual factor, limits to claim the ethical issue, and physician practice) for the MDS-R for nurses in South Korean hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Karagozoglu et al 21 reported the reliability of the scale as 0.82 and 0.85 using the test–retest correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, respectively. Chae et al 23 reported the reliability of the scale using Cronbach’s alpha as 0.91 and it is a Guttman split-half reliability as 0.83 for the total scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation