Validity and reliability of SEIS-3: An instrument for subjective measuring of strength in older adults

Sobral-Monteiro-Junior, Renato; Coutinho, Luciana Aparecida; Rodrigues, Vinícius Dias; Machado, Frederico Sander Mansur; Soares, Wellington Danilo; Oliva, Henrique Nunes Pereira; Bicalho, Camila Cristina Fonseca

doi:10.1016/j.mex.2023.102512

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reliability of the Chinese version of the HBDS-ON was assessed using the test–retest (ICC), split-half, and internal consistency reliability methods. The Cronbach’s α coefficient greater than 0.8 is considered excellent, between 0.6 and 0.8 is good, and less than 0.6 is poor ( 29 ). The translated scale demonstrated highly favorable stability and the Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.933, which is higher than the results of the English version.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study

Liu,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo test the validity and reliability of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON) in oncology nurses, the Chinese version was developed.MethodsThe Brislin double translation-back translation approach was employed to forward translation, back translation, synthesis, cross-cultural adaptation, and pre-survey, resulting in the first Chinese version of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON). A convenience sample technique was used to select 350 study participants in Liaoning, Shandong, and Jiangsu, China, who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, to assess the validity and reliability of the scale.ResultsThe Chinese version of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON) had six subscales (perceived threat, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, and personal protective equipment availability and accessibility), including 29 items. The average scale level was 0.931, and the content validity level of the items varied from 0.857 to 1.000. Each Cronbach’s α coefficient had an acceptable internal consistency reliability range of 0.806 to 0.902. X2/df = 1.667, RMSEA = 0.044, RMR = 0.018, CFI = 0.959, NFI = 0.905, TLI = 0.954, and IFI = 0.960 were the model fit outcomes in the validation factor analysis. All of the model fit markers fell within reasonable bounds.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON) has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to assess the influencing factors of chemotherapy exposure for oncology nurses in China.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The split-half value was 0.796. Test–retest reliability is considered good if the ICC is >0.75, better if the ICC is ≥0.4 and ≤ 0.75, and poor if the ICC is <0.4 ( 29 ). The ICC value measured after 2 weeks was 0.860, indicating that the Chinese version of the scale has good retest reliability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study

Liu,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Content validity reflects whether the scale items meet the measurement purpose and requirements, while construct validity describes the matching degree between the theoretical hypothesis of the scale and the actual measurement value [ 33 ]. The I-CVI of the Chinese version was between 0.833 and 1, and the S-CVI was 0.958, which was higher than the reference value of content validity and good content validity [ 34 ]. This indicates that experts recognize the content evaluated by the scale, and the language of the scale is simple and easy to understand, which is suitable for parents and caregivers of children.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study

Liu,

Zhang,

Yan

et al. 2024

BMC Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Fever is one of the most common clinical symptoms of respiratory diseases in children. Once the child has a fever, parents and caregivers are mainly concerned that the child may have a febrile convulsion. A lack of cognitive ability not only leads to anxiety but also aggravates or delays the time of children’s medical treatment and even seriously affects the prognosis because of improper management of fever patients.Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the degree of mastery of knowledge related to febrile convulsions, implement targeted guidance and health education, and ensure that parents and caregivers receive correct and reasonable first aid treatment. The purpose of this study was to translate the Febrile Convulsion Knowledge Scale for Parents/Caregivers into Chinese and to verify its reliability and validity for Chinese parents and caregivers of children. Methods The Brislin traditional translation model was used to translate the Febrile Convulsion Knowledge Scale for Parents/Caregivers from English to Chinese, following authorization from the original author of the scale. This involved literal translation, back translation, and cultural adaptation. A convenience sampling method was used to select 402 parents and caregivers of children in the pediatric ward and pediatric infusion clinic of a Grade III hospital in Liaoning Province. The item analysis method was employed to assess item differentiation, while the Delphi method was used to analyze content validity. Scale reliability was evaluated through the calculation of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to explore and verify the underlying factor structure and scale validity. Results The Chinese version of the Febrile Convulsion Knowledge Scale for Parents/Caregivers consists of 3 dimensions and 8 items. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.828, with each dimension having coefficients of 0.806, 0.720, and 0.702. The split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.716 and 0.790, respectively. The Chinese version has good reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the Bartlett sphericity test was 394.52 (p < 0.001) and that the KMO value was 0.802 > 0.600, indicating suitability for factor analysis. Principal component analysis and orthogonal rotation of maximum variance were performed on the data, and items with a load greater than 0.40 within a single factor were selected for inclusion. The resulting three-factor structure explained 70.78% of the total variance. All model fitting indices were within the acceptable range, indicating the good structural validity of the Chinese version. The results of both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support this conclusion. Conclusions The Chinese version of the Febrile Convulsion Knowledge Scale for Parents/Caregivers has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a tool for clinical pediatric nurses to evaluate the knowledge of parents and caregivers of children with febrile convulsion and provide the basis for the design and implementation of targeted training plans according to the results obtained from the Chinese scale.

show abstract

Validity and reliability of SEIS-3: An instrument for subjective measuring of strength in older adults

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About