2024
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1349514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study

Yuxiu Liu,
Lan Zhang,
Shuzhen Li
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveTo test the validity and reliability of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON) in oncology nurses, the Chinese version was developed.MethodsThe Brislin double translation-back translation approach was employed to forward translation, back translation, synthesis, cross-cultural adaptation, and pre-survey, resulting in the first Chinese version of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON). A convenience sample technique was used to select 350 study part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Invalid questionnaires, such as those for which only one option was repeated for all questions or for which there was obvious logical confusion, were screened out, and 402 valid questionnaires were ultimately obtained, for an effective recovery rate of 98.04%. Two weeks later, 30 parents and caregivers randomly selected from the participants used the same questionnaire again to assess the retest reliability of the Chinese version [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invalid questionnaires, such as those for which only one option was repeated for all questions or for which there was obvious logical confusion, were screened out, and 402 valid questionnaires were ultimately obtained, for an effective recovery rate of 98.04%. Two weeks later, 30 parents and caregivers randomly selected from the participants used the same questionnaire again to assess the retest reliability of the Chinese version [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%