2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0402-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of fluoroscopy for digital radiography: a new way to evaluate diaphragmatic mobility

Abstract: BackgroundFluoroscopy is considered the most accurate method to evaluate the diaphragm, yet most existing methods for measuring diaphragmatic mobility using fluoroscopy are complex. To assess the validity and reliability of a new evaluation method of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy by digital radiography of healthy adults.MethodsTwenty-six adults were evaluated, according to the parameters: anthropometry and pulmonary function test. The evaluation of diaphragm mobility by means of fluoroscopy by digital… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are in line with what was assessed in other studies [3,15]. Moreover, previous studies suggested a relationship between the inhaled volume and body position, supposing hemidiaphragm movements being larger in supine than in both sitting and standing subjects [3,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These values are in line with what was assessed in other studies [3,15]. Moreover, previous studies suggested a relationship between the inhaled volume and body position, supposing hemidiaphragm movements being larger in supine than in both sitting and standing subjects [3,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This was particularly true during QB, indicating that, due to the wide variability of the breathing pattern at rest, a standardized breathing maneuver should be developed to minimize the risk of error. Normal limits were established from these measurements that were comparable with those reported in other studies using both ultrasonography [8,10] and alternative methods (such as fluoroscopy [3]), although those were obtained in standing or semirecumbent subjects. We analyzed a representative sample of the healthy population with a normal distribution of the main anthropometric parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our sample as a whole, diaphragmatic mobility was found to be similar between males and females. Our results are consistent with those obtained by Saltiel et al, 15 Grams et al, 25 Pedrini, 26 and Leal et al, 27 who also found no difference in diaphragmatic mobility between males and females. However, Boussuges et al 28 and Kantarci et al 29 found differences in diaphragmatic mobility between males and females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Dysfunction of the diaphragm is common and can be caused by trauma, surgery, cervical cord or phrenic nerve damage, inflammation and mediastinal mass, and various other reasons [1]. Functional analysis and quantification of motion for diaphragms have been performed using many imaging modalities, including conventional chest radiography [2][3][4], fluoroscopy [5][6][7], ultrasonography (US) [8][9][10][11][12], computed tomography (CT) [13], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [14][15][16]. However, while understanding diaphragm kinetics is useful for monitoring, treatment, and management of respiratory diseases with diaphragm dysfunction the diaphragm's function and contribution to respiratory difficulties have not been fully investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%