2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of “Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire” for the Turkish Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study also demonstrated that C-CRIq could be used as a practical and efficient tool for measuring cognitive reserve in Chinese samples. Consistent with previous studies (Nucci et al, 2012;Maiovis et al, 2016;Ozakbas et al, 2021), the total CRI scores were strongly correlated with three subscores, indicating each proxy's significant contribution to the total CRI. In addition, our inter-subscores correlations were low to moderate, reflecting the distinct information of each proxy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study also demonstrated that C-CRIq could be used as a practical and efficient tool for measuring cognitive reserve in Chinese samples. Consistent with previous studies (Nucci et al, 2012;Maiovis et al, 2016;Ozakbas et al, 2021), the total CRI scores were strongly correlated with three subscores, indicating each proxy's significant contribution to the total CRI. In addition, our inter-subscores correlations were low to moderate, reflecting the distinct information of each proxy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results indicated that the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of C-CRIq was 0.68, slightly lower than that of the original study (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.73) (Nucci et al, 2012), but the internal consistency was acceptable. Likewise, the test-retest reliability of the C-CRIq was slightly lower than a very recent Turkey study (ICC = 0.95) ( Ozakbas et al, 2021), but it also achieved a good stability and consistency (ICC = 0.87). The potential reason might be that CRIq, especially the CRI-LeisureTime section, was required to record the frequency and years of past activities, whereas the average age of the participants in our study was older (52.3 ± 17.2) than that of the Turkish study (39.5 ± 14.0), which may have resulted in a slight offset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…It is also important to consider that the CRIq is not the only tool that can be used to obtain a life-experience proxy of CR (see for example Altieri et al, 2018;Leoń et al, 2014;Valenzuela & Sachdev, 2007); other questionnaires or scales may even outperform the predictive performance of CRIq (Kartschmit et al, 2019) and in turn, the accuracy of calculated cut-offs. We used the CRIq since it is a validated and versatile instrument that has been widely used for estimating CR in some previous researches (Artemiadis et al, 2020;Lavrencic et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2019;Maiovis et al, 2018;Ozakbas et al, 2021). Here, for the first time, we show how it can be used to build more accurate normative data for clinical uses.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq, Nucci et al, 2012) allows to estimate CR from education, occupational activity, and leisure-time activity as they concur in building up the reserve (Chan et al, 2018;Livingston et al, 2017;Scarmeas & Stern, 2003;Stern et al, 1995a, b;Ward et al, 2015). The CRIq is translated into many languages and it has been used both for clinical and research purposes (Artemiadis et al, 2020;Lavrencic et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2019;Maiovis et al, 2018;Montemurro et al, 2021a;Ozakbas et al, 2021). It has been also shown that, when using CRIq, the effect of CR significantly interacts with age in the expected cognitive performance (Montemurro et al, 2021b); in particular, as age increases performance is typically worse, but not when CRIq score is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive reserve was assessed at baseline using the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq; Nucci et al, 2012). This self-report questionnaire assesses cognitive reserve as an aggregate effect of occupational, educational, and leisure activities over the lifetime, and has been demonstrated to both be independent of measures of general intelligence (Nucci et al, 2012) and reliable across a wide range of populations (Maiovis et al, 2016;Ozakbas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Training Protocol and Cognitive Assessments At Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%