Validity and Reliability of Basic Depression Scale For Turkey

Tekindal, Melike

doi:10.29058/mjwbs.906629

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Usually, the test-retest correlation coefficient criterion was set at 0.6 28,35 . The test-retest reliability was considered satisfactory when the test-retest correlation coefficient was larger than 0.6 48–50 . Data analysis results showed the test-retest reliability from all the reviewed studies using it was greater than 0.6, ranging from 0.79 to 0.99.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-Cultural Instrument Adaptation and Validation of Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening

Lei

Chen²,

Brecht³

et al. 2021

Cancer Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The uptake of cancer screening is significantly associated with participants' health beliefs about cancer screening. Scales measuring health beliefs of cancer screening are available; however, the scales that were developed and validated for the US population may lack cultural appropriateness, which could compromise the reliability and validity of the scales when applied to different ethnic groups or populations.Objective: The aim of this study was to summarize, analyze, and compare the methods used in the cross-cultural instrument adaptation and validation processes of health beliefs about cancer screening. Methods: A systematic review design with narrative methods was used. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, were searched. Results: A total of 18 articles were eligible. Results showed (1) the translation methods included committee translation and back translation, which were further refined by using professional translators, using professional interpreters and/or involving the first author, using bilingual individuals, and involving bilingual investigators; (2) the modification methods included embedded and afterward modification; and (3) the validation methods included testing construct validity, internal consistency reliability, item-total subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, content validity, predictive validity, and face validity. Conclusions: Back translation and afterward modification were most frequently used for translating existing instruments to another language. Validity and reliability were most frequently established by construct validity, content validity, face validity, predictive validity, internal consistency reliability,

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-Cultural Instrument Adaptation and Validation of Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening

Lei

Chen²,

Brecht³

et al. 2021

Cancer Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 31 AA patients, 29 vitiligo patients, and 30 control patients volunteered to participate in the study of Erdogan et al There was no statistically significant difference between the patients with AA and the control group according to the BDI (p = 0.110) inventory. 21 In studies investigating the prevalence of anxiety in adult AA patients, point prevalence rates were reported as 3.24%, 4 4%, 3 8.4%, 20 and 13.70%. 12 In addition, some case-control studies reported that people with AA had a higher chance of being diagnosed with an anxiety disorder compared to healthy controls.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Alopecia Areata in Eskisehir, Turkey

Yildiz,

Zincir

2023

CCID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Conflicting results have emerged in studies conducted to reveal the relationship between alopecia areata (AA) and depression and anxiety. The comorbidity of depression and anxiety in patients with patchy AA who applied to a tertiary care center will be investigated and compared with a healthy control group. Methods: This study included 86 patients with AA and 85 healthy volunteers. The patients and controls completed Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BDI). Results: The average BDI of the patient group was 13.45±8.59, while in the control group, it was 7.2±5.7 (p = 0.002). The average BAI of the patient group was 12.56±8.76, while in the control group, it was 6.01±5.87 (p = 0.019). Depression was detected in 30.2% (n = 26) of the patients and anxiety was detected in 19.8% (n = 17) of the patients. In the control group, the rate of depression was 5.9% (n = 5) and the rate of anxiety was 7.1% (n = 6). There was a statistically significant difference between the patients and the control group in terms of depression (p < 0.001) and anxiety (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Depression and anxiety were more prevalent in patients with AA than in healthy volunteers. Dermatologists should keep in mind psychiatric diseases such as depression and anxiety that may accompany patients diagnosed with AA.

show abstract

“…10 Turkish validity and reliability of all these scales have been demonstrated. [12][13][14] All participants were evaluated by the same physiatrist for the diagnosis of FMS with the 2016 American College of Rheumatology criteria.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Frequency of Fibromyalgia Syndrome Between Those with and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Okçu¹,

Tuncay²,

Ertürk³

et al. 2023

J PMR Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABS TRACT Objective: Sleep disturbance plays an important role in the etiopathogenesis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). This study aimed to compare the frequency of FMS between those with and without obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). In addition, it was aimed to examine the relationship between polysomnography parameters and FMS. Materials and Methods: Twenty participants with OSAS (OSAS group) and 20 participants without OSAS (control group) were included in the study. All participants were evaluated for FMS diagnosis using the American College of Rheumatology FMS criteria. The chronic widespread pain levels of all participants were evaluated by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), their depression levels were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and their anxiety levels were evaluated by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Results: The number of patients diagnosed with FMS, chronic widespread pain NRS levels, BAI scores, and chronic pain durations of the patients in the OSAS group were found to be significantly higher than in the control group. BDI scores of both groups were similar. Among the patients in the OSAS group, no significant difference was detected in terms of polysomnography parameters between patients with FMS and patients without FMS. Conclusion: In this study, the frequency of FMS in patients with OSAS was higher than in those without OSAS. This association should be kept in mind when evaluating patients with FMS and OSAS. In addition, in this study, it was determined that the presence of FMS did not affect the polysomnography parameters of patients with OSAS.

show abstract

Validity and Reliability of Basic Depression Scale For Turkey

Cited by 8 publications

References 28 publications

Cross-Cultural Instrument Adaptation and Validation of Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening

Cross-Cultural Instrument Adaptation and Validation of Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening

Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Alopecia Areata in Eskisehir, Turkey

Comparison of the Frequency of Fibromyalgia Syndrome Between Those with and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About