Aim: To compare hospital admissions from infancy to adulthood, between children born with orofacial clefts (OFC) and those without OFC. Results: Overall, 1396 children were diagnosed with an OFC and compared with 6566 children without OFC. Individuals born with OFC were up to three times more likely to be admitted to hospital, had more admissions and longer cumulative length of stay in all age periods. Children with OFC were also more likely to be admitted for ear and digestive system conditions (RR up to 30 and 6 times higher respectively). Children with CLAP and CPO were more likely to be admitted for respiratory conditions (RR 1.3 to 2.0) and children with CPO were six times more likely to be admitted for care for other congenital anomalies.
MethodsConclusions: Throughout childhood, individuals born with OFC were more likely to be admitted, and had more hospitalisations than those without OFC. Children born with CLAP or CPO had a higher hospitalisation burden than children born with CLO.