2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of WINROP for detecting retinopathy of prematurity in a North American cohort of preterm infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NTproBNP and NTproBNP-based scores share the problem of limited generalizability with proportional weight gain (20,21) or risk factor-based models (22,24). In contrast to the expectations underlying this multinational endeavor, the results of this study do not allow for a change in current clinical practice in infants o30 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NTproBNP and NTproBNP-based scores share the problem of limited generalizability with proportional weight gain (20,21) or risk factor-based models (22,24). In contrast to the expectations underlying this multinational endeavor, the results of this study do not allow for a change in current clinical practice in infants o30 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although immaturity and oxygen exposure are pivotal for the development of ROP, the risk of severe ROP is further increased by poor postnatal growth. This link is thought to be mediated by low levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and serves as a base for ROP prediction models such as WINROP (20) or CHOPROP (21). Furthermore, severe ROP is more common in infants with conditions that increase myocardial pressure or volume load, such as sepsis (22,23), blood transfusions (23,24), pulmonary hypertension treated with inhaled nitric oxide (25), patent ductus arteriosus (23), or inotrope use (22,(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the results of 12 countries of both high-and moderate-/low-income status who have participated in the WINROP study, including our study. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Overall, WINROP has been reported to have good efficacy as a screening tool. However, the sensitivity of WINROP varies among countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study outcome has been described in numerous countries. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In Asia, it has been reported in China, Korea, Taiwan, India and Japan. 6,7,11,15,16 Based on a PubMed search, no similar reports are available from the South East Asia region, especially in a developing country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although telemedicine and digital photography have improved access in some areas, costs, training expertise and other practicalities restrict universal screening . This and the physical discomfort and instability caused to the infant , and distressing nature of the examination to the family, mean that noninvasive markers of ROP development have been sought, and algorithms generated to attempt to maximise the performance of features associated with ROP development to accurately predict this . To date, no ‘ideal’ biomarkers of ROP have been identified and sufficiently tested, but urinary B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) shows promise .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%