2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3-Dimensional surface imaging of the face, while it is to date the most accurate F I G U R E 5 Mean SVC in the premenopausal subjects at 14 days, 3 and 6 months F I G U R E 6 Mean SVC in the postmenopausal subjects at 14 days, 3 and 6 months measurement tool for assessing volume changes in a radiation-free manner, carries the potential of inaccuracies when measuring volume increase. [19][20][21] Even though environmental factors remained constant during the capturing process (ie, same room and same lighting), physiological variables as swelling, weight changes, or minimally different facial expressions as well as slightly deviating posture limit a perfect alignment of baseline and follow-up scans.…”
Section: A Further Strength Of This Study Is the Injection Technique Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-Dimensional surface imaging of the face, while it is to date the most accurate F I G U R E 5 Mean SVC in the premenopausal subjects at 14 days, 3 and 6 months F I G U R E 6 Mean SVC in the postmenopausal subjects at 14 days, 3 and 6 months measurement tool for assessing volume changes in a radiation-free manner, carries the potential of inaccuracies when measuring volume increase. [19][20][21] Even though environmental factors remained constant during the capturing process (ie, same room and same lighting), physiological variables as swelling, weight changes, or minimally different facial expressions as well as slightly deviating posture limit a perfect alignment of baseline and follow-up scans.…”
Section: A Further Strength Of This Study Is the Injection Technique Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface scanner is equipped with structured light technology, which allows for a 3D point accuracy of up to 0.1 mm and a 3D resolution of up to 0.5 mm as specified by the manufacturer. With an operating distance ranging between 0.4 and 1 m, it enables the operator to rapidly capture localized areas of the human body [21][22][23][25][26][27]. For the duration of the imaging process, the surface scanner was tethered via USBinterface to a commercially available capture Dell XPS 159560 laptop.…”
Section: Imaging Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In einer aktuellen Studie zum 3D-Imaging des Gesichts unter Verwendung dreier unterschiedlicher Systeme konnte diesem Verfahren, unabhängig vom System, eine hohe Reproduzierbarkeit in der 3D-Oberflächenrekonstruktion nachgewiesen werden [27]. Ähnliche Ergebnisse konnten auch Koban et al 2019 bei der Untersuchung drei verschiedener Systeme zur Dokumentation und Planung einer Rhinoplastik herausfinden [28]. Zwei der verwendeten Systeme stellten bei dieser Studie eine geeignete Option für die objektive Dokumentation der Rhinoplastik dar [28].…”
Section: Exploratives Erweitertes Modellunclassified
“…Ähnliche Ergebnisse konnten auch Koban et al 2019 bei der Untersuchung drei verschiedener Systeme zur Dokumentation und Planung einer Rhinoplastik herausfinden [28]. Zwei der verwendeten Systeme stellten bei dieser Studie eine geeignete Option für die objektive Dokumentation der Rhinoplastik dar [28]. In einer zuvor durchgeführten Kadaverstudie konnte sogar der Nachweis prä-, intra- sowie postinterventioneller Unterschiede bei der Injektion von 0,5 CC Aliquots ins Gesicht mit 3D-Oberflächenscannern erbracht werden [29].…”
Section: Exploratives Erweitertes Modellunclassified