Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref) is a frequently used instrument to assess the quality of life in both healthy and ill populations. Inquiries of the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-Bref report that the validity and reliability is generally satisfactory. However, some studies fail to support a four-factor dimensionality; others report poor reliability of the social and environmental domain; and there may be some challenges of supporting construct validity across age. This paper evaluates the psychometric properties of the Norwegian WHOQOL-Bref and extends previous research by testing for measurement invariance across age, gender and education level. In addition, we provide updated normative data for the Norwegian population. Methods We selected a random sample of the Norwegian population (n = 654) aged 18–75 years. Participants filled out the WHOQOL-Bref, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and various sociodemographic variables. Results We found an acceptable convergent and discriminate validity and internal consistency of the physical, psychological and environmental domains, but a marginal reliability was found for the social domain. The factor loadings were invariant across gender, education and age. Some items had low factor loadings and explained variance, and the model fit for the age group 60–75 years were less satisfactory. Conclusions The original four-factor dimensionality of the WHOQOL-Bref displayed a better fit to the data compared to the one-factor solution and is recommended for use in the Norwegian population. The WHOQOL-Bref is suitable to use across gender, education and age, but for assessment in the oldest age group, the WHOQOL-Old module could be a good supplementary, but further studies are needed.

The Association Between Level of Physical Activity and Body Mass Index, and Quality of Life Among Elderly Women

“…The responses to each question were given on a five-point Likert scale, whereby the respondents could select one of the following responses: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) A moderate amount; (4) Very much; and (5) An extreme amount. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were confirmed in the studies of Jude and Abdel (2009) and Kalfoss et al (2021) . The reliability and validity of the Serbian version of the WHOQoL questionnaire were determined by Ač-Nikolić et al (2010) on a population of individuals over the age of 60.…”

Effect of Neuromuscular Training Program on Quality of Life After COVID-19 Lockdown Among Young Healthy Participants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Each item was rated by the respondents on a five-point Likert scale (1—Not at all; 2—A little; 3—A moderate amount; 4—Very much; and 5—An extreme amount). As the WHOQOL-BREF reliability and validity have been confirmed in prior study ( Kalfoss et al, 2021 ), it was adopted in this study without further evaluations or modifications.…”

Validation of the Kazakh-language version of the World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire on the quality of life among the elderly population of Aktobe city

“…In studies in Norway, which studied a random sample of the Norwegian population (n=654) aged 18-75 years using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, 226 participants (36%) of them elderly did not reveal statistically significant differences in the quality of life among the population by gender [24 ]. In a random sample of 1492 Dutch people aged 50 and over, [25] conducted a study to compare the relationship of gender, age, marital status, education and income with quality of life assessed by different questionnaires SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD.…”