2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1464-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Wexner scale in women with fecal incontinence in a Turkish population

Abstract: The Turkish translated version of the Wexner scale is a reliable, consistent, and valid instrument to evaluate anal functions in women with anal incontinence for Turkish speaking women. Total and subscale scores of the Wexner scale and anal manometric measurements showed significant correlation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scoring Scale [ 16 ] has become a widely used for the assessment of severity of fecal incontinence and has been validated to Turkish population, previously [ 17 ]. This scale included five questions that were three about anal incontinence (gas, liquid, and solid), a coping mechanism (pad wear), and a lifestyle question (alteration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scoring Scale [ 16 ] has become a widely used for the assessment of severity of fecal incontinence and has been validated to Turkish population, previously [ 17 ]. This scale included five questions that were three about anal incontinence (gas, liquid, and solid), a coping mechanism (pad wear), and a lifestyle question (alteration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The FISI was suggested to increase the understanding of patient values; but it was also advised to be replicated in other populations. 1 In a Turkish population, the Wexner score 5 was validated 8 and used in clinical trials, 9 but a weighted instrument for AI does not exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The FIQL is the most widely used instrument in the international literature, validated in several different languages: French, Italian, German, Spanish, Norwegian, Turkish, Chinese, Japanese, English, and Portuguese, while the WS has only been validated in Portuguese and in Turkish. 8,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The FIQL evaluates the QoL of the FI patient without addressing the loss of gases, which differs from the WS. This fact is shown to be an advantageous aspect of the WS, since flatus incontinence is fairly common and is often the only manifestation of AI, which has an impact on the QoL, especially when associated with fecal loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%