2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0479-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThere is growing recognition for the consequences of rectal cancer treatment to maintain an adequate functional sphincter in the long-term rather than preserving the anal sphincter itself. This study aims to evaluate long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life (QoL) among locally advanced rectal cancer patients.MethodsTwenty-nine patients treated with nCRT followed by low anterior resect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with all other validation studies of the LARS score . It is already well documented that preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy results in an impaired QoL in patients with rectal cancer .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with all other validation studies of the LARS score . It is already well documented that preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy results in an impaired QoL in patients with rectal cancer .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in accordance with all other validation studies of the LARS score [6][7][8][9]. It is already well documented that preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy results in an impaired QoL in patients with rectal cancer [18][19][20][21][22]. The Dutch version of the LARS score was also able to discriminate between types of surgery (PME vs TME), just as in the English and the consolidated international validations [6,9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For rectal cancer patients, surgeons should increase awareness of both oncological as well as long-term functional outcomes. 37 According to our results of PRT/PCRT in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes, metastases of the primary tumor and postoperative adverse effects were the primary two barriers to an improved OS. Therefore, simplified and optimized therapies which could maintain the present advantages of PRT/PCRT, further improve MFS and decrease adverse effects should be developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, our long‐term results emphasize that the risk of anorectal dysfunction after preoperative treatment should be communicated to patients. For rectal cancer patients, surgeons should increase awareness of both oncological as well as long‐term functional outcomes …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the evidence suggesting no increased risk of postoperative septic complications, there is still concern regarding anticipated long‐term functional outcomes and pouch failure in those receiving EBRT prior to IPAA. This concern is probably extrapolated from literature demonstrating that neoadjuvant EBRT contributes to low anterior resection syndrome and impaired quality of life when performing a low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer . Interestingly, in the series of nine patients by Wu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%