2012
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

Abstract: BackgroundAn integrative theoretical framework, developed for cross-disciplinary implementation and other behaviour change research, has been applied across a wide range of clinical situations. This study tests the validity of this framework.MethodsValidity was investigated by behavioural experts sorting 112 unique theoretical constructs using closed and open sort tasks. The extent of replication was tested by Discriminant Content Validation and Fuzzy Cluster Analysis.ResultsThere was good support for a refine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
3,764
0
19

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,054 publications
(3,805 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
22
3,764
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…knowledge, skill, professional role and identity and environmental context and resources. 25 TDF was used to provide headings to code the transcripts which were then analysed independently by members of the study team using the Framework Approach. This is a systematic method of categorising large amounts of qualitative data and identifies 'commonalities and differences in qualitative data, before focusing on relationships between different parts of the data, thereby seeking to draw descriptive and/or explanatory conclusions clustered around themes.'…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…knowledge, skill, professional role and identity and environmental context and resources. 25 TDF was used to provide headings to code the transcripts which were then analysed independently by members of the study team using the Framework Approach. This is a systematic method of categorising large amounts of qualitative data and identifies 'commonalities and differences in qualitative data, before focusing on relationships between different parts of the data, thereby seeking to draw descriptive and/or explanatory conclusions clustered around themes.'…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, FBM is merely a model for analysing behaviours, whereas the COM-B is situated within the BCW, which would translate the behavioural analysis into the design of specific intervention features that target those COM-B components to produce the change. Second, developers of the BCW have made deliberate efforts to link each COM-B component with one or more domains under the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), an integrative framework that groups behaviour change theories into 14 domains based on overlapping constructs [3]. In a nutshell, the TDF can be seen as a variant of the COM-B model with a more fine-grained classification of facets underlying behaviours.…”
Section: Framework Guiding the Study: Behaviour Change Wheelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-structured interviews based on the TDF (see Table 1) were conducted within a week following the collection of diaries. Prior to each interview, the researcher reviewed all diaries and marked specific events or behavioural patterns pertinent to theoretical constructs [3] for elaboration and clarification in interviews. The researcher also transcribed diary entries onto a spreadsheet, which was then used to produce a visual representation of the sit-break pattern for each participant (Fig.…”
Section: Procedures and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This framework can therefore be used to guide specific interventional strategies to enable behavioural change in practice implementation. 5,10,11 Effectively changing behaviour is critical for the successful implementation of evidence-based practice. 10 Nevertheless, in the past, implementation strategies were often applied with little evidence or rationale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%