2016
DOI: 10.1002/fld.4267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the S‐CLSVOF method with the density‐scaled balanced continuum surface force model in multiphase systems coupled with thermocapillary flows

Abstract: Summary Three numerical methods, namely, volume of fluid (VOF), simple coupled volume of fluid with level set (S‐CLSVOF), and S‐CLSVOF with the density‐scaled balanced continuum surface force (CSF) model, have been incorporated into OpenFOAM source code and were validated for their accuracy for three cases: (i) an isothermal static case, (ii) isothermal dynamic cases, and (iii) non‐isothermal dynamic cases with thermocapillary flow including dynamic interface deformation. Results have shown that the S‐CLSVOF m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Heyns and Oxtoby [68] implemented a selection of surface tension modelling approaches (e.g., the CSF, a variant of Smoothed CSF and a force-balanced higher-resolution artificial compressive formulation) to model a stationary bubble. To the best of the authors' knowledge, a recent study by Yamamoto et al [36] is the only one of its kind where different surface tension models (i.e., S-CLSVOF, density scaled S-CLSVOF and CSF) are compared based on a variety of processes with various capillary numbers (e.g., rising bubbles, capillary rise, capillary wave and thermocapillary flows).…”
Section: Publication Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study by Heyns and Oxtoby [68] implemented a selection of surface tension modelling approaches (e.g., the CSF, a variant of Smoothed CSF and a force-balanced higher-resolution artificial compressive formulation) to model a stationary bubble. To the best of the authors' knowledge, a recent study by Yamamoto et al [36] is the only one of its kind where different surface tension models (i.e., S-CLSVOF, density scaled S-CLSVOF and CSF) are compared based on a variety of processes with various capillary numbers (e.g., rising bubbles, capillary rise, capillary wave and thermocapillary flows).…”
Section: Publication Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational domain used for the simulation is a rectangle of dimensions 1 m × 2 m where the bubble of diameter 0.5 m was initialised such that the centre of the bubble is at a distance of 0.5 m from the bottom and side walls. As mesh convergence could not be achieved perfectly in previous works [36,55], we used a uniform grid 160 × 320 for the simulations, corresponding to the fine mesh used in [54]. The pressure boundary conditions used in the simulations were zero gradient on the side and bottom walls, and a Dirchlet condition (equal to zero) at the top wall.…”
Section: Two Dimensional Rising Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interface tension related erroneous flows are best treated by improving the curvature calculation. This might be done using an (additional) height or level set function [92,[95][96][97][98][99]. Furthermore, a posterior damping of spurious velocities is possible by smoothing the curvature field and filtering interface-parallel velocities [86].…”
Section: Appendix a Spurious Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of validation, the source term S σ in Eq. (8) is resolved into the normal f σ,n and the tangential f σ,t components [13,14,24] and is expressed by:…”
Section: Free Surface Thermocapillary Flow With Phase Changementioning
confidence: 99%