2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Retinal Detachment after Open Globe Injury (RD-OGI) Score as an Effective Tool for Predicting Retinal Detachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results did not show a correlation between the development of postoperative RD and IOFB size, entry site and endophthalmitis. In a recent study, Brodowska et al published the validation of RD after Open Globe Injury Score (RD-OGI SCORE), which can predict the future risk of RD based on clinical findings at initial presentation [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our results did not show a correlation between the development of postoperative RD and IOFB size, entry site and endophthalmitis. In a recent study, Brodowska et al published the validation of RD after Open Globe Injury Score (RD-OGI SCORE), which can predict the future risk of RD based on clinical findings at initial presentation [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High RD-OGI scores are associated with RD by 30 days after surgery. 33,34 Early diagnosis of RD after OGI repair can be diagnosed with B-scan ultrasonography, and we recommended this on the first day after the operation. Prognosis and risk of RD should be discussed in depth with the OGI patients, and B-scan ultrasound should be done as early as possible, especially within 1 month for patients who could not get fundusexamination results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25 ] Because globe injury itself does predispose to this complication, no differentiation can be made between prosthesis-induced RD and trauma-induced RD. [ 26 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%