2023
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022018896
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study by Meggendorfer and colleagues reported significantly shorter overall survival (OS) in patients harboring both alterations compared to MDS-5q patients lacking SF3B1 mutation, while another study by Malcovati et al found no OS difference in a comparable retrospective cohort. 29 Mutations affecting the genes DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 are frequently identified in MDS as first and driver mutations, including MDS-5q cases. 27 DNMT3A mutations occur in roughly 18% of MDS-5q cases, while TET2 mutations were described in nearly 12% of patients.…”
Section: Other Molecular Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study by Meggendorfer and colleagues reported significantly shorter overall survival (OS) in patients harboring both alterations compared to MDS-5q patients lacking SF3B1 mutation, while another study by Malcovati et al found no OS difference in a comparable retrospective cohort. 29 Mutations affecting the genes DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 are frequently identified in MDS as first and driver mutations, including MDS-5q cases. 27 DNMT3A mutations occur in roughly 18% of MDS-5q cases, while TET2 mutations were described in nearly 12% of patients.…”
Section: Other Molecular Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversial data surround the prognosis of SF3B1 mutations in MDS‐5q patients. One study by Meggendorfer and colleagues reported significantly shorter overall survival (OS) in patients harboring both alterations compared to MDS‐5q patients lacking SF3B1 mutation, while another study by Malcovati et al found no OS difference in a comparable retrospective cohort 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bernard et al proposed the molecular upgrade of IPSS, namely IPSS-M, which incorporates the aberrations of 31 genes of confirmed independent impact on MDS prognosis [ 62 ]. The prognostic advantage of IPSS-M has now been validated and challenged over IPSS or IPSS-R in external cohorts [ 63 ]. Similarly, the 2022 European Leukemia Net (ELN) recommendations incorporated mutations in BCOR , EZH2 , SF3B1 , SRSF2 , STAG2 , U2AF1 , and ZRSR2 into the adverse risk category of AML on top of their 2017’s recommendations to define cases with an MDS-like signature [ 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Hma Resistant Mds/aml Assessment and Prognostication Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have consistently shown that IPSS-M surpasses IPSS-R in prognostic accuracy for various clinical outcomes. [7][8][9] In this study, we evaluated the prognostic performances of IPSS-R and IPSS-M for patients with MDS undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT) and investigated whether prophylactic intervention could improve the post-transplant survival based on IPSS-M risk category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%