2006
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-200605001-02966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Lifecorder EX Activity Monitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of 10 pedometer/accelerometers were able to estimate the treadmill walking distance to within ± 10% and the gross energy expenditure to within ± 30% of the actual value at a walking speed of 4.8 km/h Schneider et al 2003). Values tended to be underestimated at speeds below 4.8 km/h (Albright et al 2006), and at 3.2 km/h the Kenz Lifecorder and Actigraph yielded step counts that were, respectively, 92 ± 6% and 64 ± 15% of the true values, although at higher speeds (80-188 m/min) both devices yielded estimates within 3% of the true figure (Abel et al 2008). Other measures of absolute accuracy have included comparisons with a heel-mounted resistance pad [an error of 460 ± 1,080 steps/days.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most of 10 pedometer/accelerometers were able to estimate the treadmill walking distance to within ± 10% and the gross energy expenditure to within ± 30% of the actual value at a walking speed of 4.8 km/h Schneider et al 2003). Values tended to be underestimated at speeds below 4.8 km/h (Albright et al 2006), and at 3.2 km/h the Kenz Lifecorder and Actigraph yielded step counts that were, respectively, 92 ± 6% and 64 ± 15% of the true values, although at higher speeds (80-188 m/min) both devices yielded estimates within 3% of the true figure (Abel et al 2008). Other measures of absolute accuracy have included comparisons with a heel-mounted resistance pad [an error of 460 ± 1,080 steps/days.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 96%