2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2268-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective

Abstract: Over the years, techniques for the study of human movement have ranged in complexity and precision from direct observation of the subject through activity diaries, questionnaires, and recordings of body movement, to the measurement of physiological responses, studies of metabolism and indirect and direct calorimetry. This article reviews developments in each of these domains. Particular reference is made to their impact upon the continuing search for valid field estimates of activity patterns and energy expend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such estimates proved adequate for a simple 2-3 level classification of habitual activity patterns, but major systematic errors in the estimation of active energy expenditures precluded the interpretation of responses in terms of dose-response relationships (Shephard 2003a;Shephard and Aoyagi 2012).…”
Section: Quantification Of Habitual Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such estimates proved adequate for a simple 2-3 level classification of habitual activity patterns, but major systematic errors in the estimation of active energy expenditures precluded the interpretation of responses in terms of dose-response relationships (Shephard 2003a;Shephard and Aoyagi 2012).…”
Section: Quantification Of Habitual Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indirect calorimetry methods, based on the determination of overall oxygen consumption by respirometers, also provide data of debated validity. Therefore, until recently, physical activity assessment for epidemiological purposes mostly relied on questionnaires [35]. Although activity monitors might provide more accurate and reliable (i.e.…”
Section: Field Measurement Of Physical Activity In Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the pedometer is attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, but my understanding is that he eyed his device as a military tool, a means of measuring the boundaries of contested territory. Application of the pedometer to the monitoring of personal walking patterns should probably be attributed to an 18th century Swiss watchmaker, Abraham Louis Perrelet (1729-1826), and it was the dedicated pedestrian Thomas Jefferson who popularized the pedometer in North America (Shephard and Aoyagi 2012). This chapter gives clear descriptions of some of the most popular physical activity questionnaires, but I wonder whether the rating of their validity as "fair to moderate" shines adequate light upon the 3-to 5-fold absolute error associated with the activity estimates that are derived from some of these instruments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%