2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-006-1087-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument

Abstract: BackgroundThe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument (CTSI) is a disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire that consists of a symptom severity scale (SS) and a functional status scale (FS). The CTSI was cross-culturally adapted and developed by the Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand (JSSH). The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the CTSI (CTSI-JSSH).MethodsA consecutive series of 87 patients with c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of the Portuguese version, factor analysis of both scales combined showed that items 7 and 11 associated mainly with the functional status scale items [10]. In a factor analysis of the Japanese version of the symptom severity scale, item 7 had low loadings in a 2-factor model and item 11 had the lowest loading in a 1-factor model [11]. The factor analysis of the 11-item symptom severity scale showed that items 7 and 11 were more associated with functional status items, which questions the inclusion of these two items in a symptoms scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study of the Portuguese version, factor analysis of both scales combined showed that items 7 and 11 associated mainly with the functional status scale items [10]. In a factor analysis of the Japanese version of the symptom severity scale, item 7 had low loadings in a 2-factor model and item 11 had the lowest loading in a 1-factor model [11]. The factor analysis of the 11-item symptom severity scale showed that items 7 and 11 were more associated with functional status items, which questions the inclusion of these two items in a symptoms scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, these scales were developed without examining their latent structure using, for example, factor analysis. To our knowledge, the latent structure of the symptom severity and functional status scales has subsequently been examined in only two translated versions of the scales [10,11]. Moreover, all previous studies that assessed the CTS scales used classical test methodology and involved relatively small populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of them are disease-specific measures such as the Brigham and Women’s Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [13] or the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument [17, 18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for the clinical evaluation before and after wrist splinting, we used two patient-oriented questionnaires which have been recognized as important tools and which have been widely used for CTS; the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version-Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH-JSSH) 10,11) and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument (CTSI-JSSH), 11,12) which consisted of a Symptom Severity Scale (CTSI-JSSH-SS) and Functional Status Scale (CTSI-JSSH-FS). The QuickDASH was developed as a shortened version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) outcome measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11) The CTSI-JSSH is a Japanese version of the self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for the assessment of the symptom severity and functional score consisting of two scales. 11,12) The CTSI-JSSH-SS and the CTSI-JSSH-FS have 11 and 8 questions, respectively. The assessment of each question was on a score of 1 point to 5 points, in which 1 indicates no symptom and 5 indicates severe symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%