Symptoms of pain, numbness, and tingling in the hands are common in the general population. Based on our data, 1 in 5 symptomatic subjects would be expected to have CTS based on clinical examination and electrophysiologic testing.

Background: The 30-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is increasingly used in clinical research involving upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. From the original DASH a shorter version, the 11-item QuickDASH, has been developed. Little is known about the discriminant ability of score changes for the QuickDASH compared to the DASH. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the QuickDASH and its cross-sectional and longitudinal validity and reliability.

Background: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a selfadministered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upperextremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. The main purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal construct validity of the DASH among patients undergoing surgery. The second purpose was to quantify self-rated treatment effectiveness after surgery.

No abstract

Objective To develop a psychometrically appropriate brief symptoms measure of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods Preoperative CTS 11-item symptom severity and 8-item functional status scales from 693 patients (71% women) with CTS were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis yielding a revised CTS symptoms scale. A validation sample of 213 patients (68% women) with CTS completed the 11-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), and the revised symptoms scale and 116 patients also completed the original CTS symptom severity scale (median interval 11 days). Results Of the 11 CTS symptom severity scale items, 2 items that on factor analysis associated with the functional status items were removed. After IRT recalibrations of the remaining symptom severity scale items, 2 non-fitting items were removed and 2 items were merged creating the 6-item CTS symptoms scale. Factor analysis showed one dominant factor explaining 58% of the variance. Reliability was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.86; IRT person separation reliability = 0.88). No item displayed significant differential item functioning. The 6-item CTS symptoms scale showed strong correlation with the QuickDASH (r = 0.70) and agreement with the original symptom severity scale (ICC = 0.80). Conclusion The 6-item CTS symptoms scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in CTS.

Background: Numerous nerve conduction tests are used for the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), with a wide range of sensitivity and specificity reported for each test in clinical studies. The tests have not been assessed in population-based studies. Such information would be important when using electrodiagnosis in epidemiologic research. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of various nerve conduction tests in population-based CTS and determine the properties of the most accurate test.

Objective. To investigate the relationship between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and keyboard use at work in a general population.Methods. A health status questionnaire was mailed to 2,465 persons of working age (25-65 years) who were randomly selected from the general population of a representative region of Sweden. The questionnaire required the subjects to provide information about the presence and severity of pain, numbness and tingling in each body region, employment history, and work activities, including average time spent using a keyboard during a usual working day. Those reporting recurrent hand numbness or tingling in the median nerve distribution were asked to undergo a physical examination and nerve conduction testing. The prevalence of CTS, defined as symptoms plus abnormal results on nerve conduction tests, was compared between groups of subjects that differed in their intensity of keyboard use, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status.Results. Eighty-two percent responded to the questionnaire, and 80% of all symptomatic persons attended the examinations. Persons who had reported intensive keyboard use on the questionnaire were significantly less likely to be diagnosed as having CTS than were those who had reported little keyboard use, with a prevalence that increased from 2.6% in the highest keyboard use group (>4 hours/day), to 2.9% in the moderate use group (1 to <4 hours/day), 4.9% in the low use group (<1 hour/day), and 5.2% in the no keyboard use at work group (P for trend ‫؍‬ 0.032). Using >1 hour/day to designate high keyboard use and <1 hour/ day to designate low keyboard use, the prevalence ratio of CTS in the groups with high to low keyboard use was 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.32, 0.96). Conclusion. Intensive keyboard use appears to be associated with a lower risk of CTS.Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is commonly cited as one of the possible harmful effects of intensive computer work. Most of the research performed on the association between CTS and work activities has involved its incidence or prevalence among specific occupational groups (1-3) or in association with different types of work activities categorized according to repetitiveness and force (4). Although keyboard use may be described as highly repetitive work, hand activities involved in keyboard use do not resemble other types of repetitive activities reported to adversely affect the median nerve at the wrist. Few studies concerning the occupational risk factors of CTS have specifically involved keyboard use, and such studies were typically conducted with occupational groups rather than general populations (5), which may make the results more subject to bias in symptom or exposure reporting. In addition, results have usually been discussed in terms of whether or not intensive keyboard use is associated with an increased risk of CTS (6). However, this relationship has not been investigated in population-based studies of CTS, and the type of relationship remains uncertain.

Purpose:Online courses have become common in health sciences education. This learning environment can be designed using different approaches to support student learning. To further develop online environment, it is important to understand how students perceive working and learning online. The aim of this study is to identify aspects influencing students’ learning processes and their adaptation to self-directed learning online.Methods:Thirty-four physiotherapy students with a mean age of 25 years (range, 21 to 34 years) participated. Qualitative content analysis and triangulation was used when investigating the students’ self-reflections, written during a five week self-directed, problem-oriented online course.Results:Two categories emerged: ‘the influence of the structured framework’ and ‘communication and interaction with teachers and peers.’ The learning processes were influenced by external factors, e.g., a clear structure including a transparent alignment of assignments and assessment. Important challenges to over-come were primarily internal factors, e.g., low self-efficacy, difficulties to plan the work effectively and adapting to a new environment.Conclusion:The analyses reflected important perspectives targeting areas which enable further course development. The influences of external and internal factors on learning strategies and self-efficacy are important aspects to consider when designing online courses. Factors such as pedagogical design, clarity of purpose, goals, and guidelines were important as well as continuous opportunities for communication and collaboration. Further studies are needed to understand and scaffold the motivational factors among students with low self-efficacy.