2014
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self‐directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology

Abstract: The ARCS Model of Motivational Design has been used myriad times to design motivational instructions that focus on Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction in order to motivate students. The Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) is a 36-item situational measure of people's reactions to instructional materials in the light of the ARCS Model. Although the IMMS has been used often, both as a pre-test and a posttest tool serving as either a motivational needs assessment prior to instruction or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
1
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
88
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Keller states that if the first three principles are met, learners' overall satisfaction will be enhanced accordingly [23], [24]. The IMMS survey was designed to evaluate whether the instructional material is in line with the aforementioned principles and examine what students' motivation levels are.…”
Section: Imms Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keller states that if the first three principles are met, learners' overall satisfaction will be enhanced accordingly [23], [24]. The IMMS survey was designed to evaluate whether the instructional material is in line with the aforementioned principles and examine what students' motivation levels are.…”
Section: Imms Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMMS was used to measure the significant differences on learning motivation between the two groups of learners both before and after the experimental teaching. Many studies on education used the IMMS to explore the impact of different teaching methods on learning motivation (e.g., Loorbach, Peters, Karreman, & Steehouder, ; Mahle, ; Rodgers & Withrow‐Thorton, ). It consisted of 33 items and used a 5‐point Likert scale: one denoted “strongly disagree” and five denoted “strongly agree.” Cronbach's α value of reliability reached 0.782 in the pretest and 0.829 in the posttest, which exceeded the threshold recommended by Nunnally (), showing good internal consistency.…”
Section: Experimental Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMMS was used to measure the significant differences on learning motivation between the two groups of learners both before and after the experimental teaching. Many studies on education used the IMMS to explore the impact of different teaching methods on learning motivation (e.g., Loorbach, Peters, Karreman, & Steehouder, 2015;Mahle, 2011;Rodgers & Withrow-Thorton, 2005).…”
Section: Learning Motivation Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focused on the three Web 2.0 tools listed in Table III since they are among the most widely used and recognized by students for education [29]. [30] 2. This material was more difficult to understand than I would like for it to be.…”
Section: B Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-point Likert scale used to determine the participants" perspectives for the level of agreement\disagreement expressed by them on each item, in which, 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree. This study was used the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), a 36-item situational measure of motivation based on the ARCS model [30]. The IMMS measures all four ARCS Factors: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction.…”
Section: Data Collection and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%