2011
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoratic Society Minor Criteria for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients Without Major Criteria or Contraindications to Intensive Care Unit Care

Abstract: In a population of patients with CAP without contraindications to ICU care, the IDSA/ATS minor criteria predict subsequent requirement for MV/VS, ICU admission, and 30-day mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
85
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(69 reference statements)
5
85
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scoring systems, such as the SMART-COP rule [24], the SCAP/Espana rule [25,26], the CORB score [27] and the REA-ICU rule [28] have been introduced and incorporate variations of the ATS minor criteria and/or additional factors such as low arterial pH, albumin, tachycardia and hyponatraemia. While their prediction of severe CAP showed accuracies comparable to those of the ATS rules [23,29], the latter three have not been validated in external cohorts so far. A recent study compared most of these scores with a rigorous design, excluding patients with immediate need for vasopressor use and/or mechanical ventilation as well as patients not suitable for ICU care owing to advanced directives or major comorbid illnesses [23].…”
Section: Clinical Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other scoring systems, such as the SMART-COP rule [24], the SCAP/Espana rule [25,26], the CORB score [27] and the REA-ICU rule [28] have been introduced and incorporate variations of the ATS minor criteria and/or additional factors such as low arterial pH, albumin, tachycardia and hyponatraemia. While their prediction of severe CAP showed accuracies comparable to those of the ATS rules [23,29], the latter three have not been validated in external cohorts so far. A recent study compared most of these scores with a rigorous design, excluding patients with immediate need for vasopressor use and/or mechanical ventilation as well as patients not suitable for ICU care owing to advanced directives or major comorbid illnesses [23].…”
Section: Clinical Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While their prediction of severe CAP showed accuracies comparable to those of the ATS rules [23,29], the latter three have not been validated in external cohorts so far. A recent study compared most of these scores with a rigorous design, excluding patients with immediate need for vasopressor use and/or mechanical ventilation as well as patients not suitable for ICU care owing to advanced directives or major comorbid illnesses [23]. Evaluated end-points included the need for mechanical ventilation or vasopressor use, and the 2007 minor criteria achieved the highest prediction (area under the curve 0.85: sensitivity 79%, positive predicted value 23%).…”
Section: Clinical Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations