2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-016-9412-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Factorial Structure of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure for Use with Iranian Youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there were gender differences regarding which items appear to matter most to dimensions of resilience, there were no differences in overall CYRM scores by gender. This is consistent with other studies that find that adolescent girls and boys in the Middle East have similar CYRM-28 scores (e.g., Ghannam & Thabet, 2014;Zand et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there were gender differences regarding which items appear to matter most to dimensions of resilience, there were no differences in overall CYRM scores by gender. This is consistent with other studies that find that adolescent girls and boys in the Middle East have similar CYRM-28 scores (e.g., Ghannam & Thabet, 2014;Zand et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The CYRM-28 has shown a three-factor structure corresponding to individual capacities, relationships with caregivers, and contextual resources in samples from Canada (Liebenberg, Ungar, & Van de Vijver, 2012). Work in the Middle Eastern region suggests that these three factors may hold there as well (e.g., Ghannam & Thabet, 2014;Zand, Liebenberg, & Shamloo, 2016), although comprehensive analyses of reliability and validity-including factor structure and item loadings-have not been provided, nor the Arabic translation made available in published work. For use in omnibus surveys, a shorter screening measure with 12 items (CYRM-12) and a single-factor structure was developed and validated with two Canadian samples, one at risk and one population based (Liebenberg, Ungar, & LeBlanc, 2013).…”
Section: Existing Measures Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we examined the factor structure of the CYRM-28 in a sample of Australian Indigenous secondary boarding school students as part of a broader validation process and to specifically assess the impact of contextual and cross-cultural adaptation processes which amended a standard measurement instrument. Previous studies examining the factor structure of the CYRM-28 across samples in different countries demonstrated that whilst there are common elements of resilience across different populations, the way items grouped was different between contexts ( 27 31 ). These previous examinations of the factor structure of resilience highlighted aspects of relevance the our study: the importance of parent (caregiver) capacity; a sample of vulnerable youth; and more collective ways of being ( 27 , 29 , 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adapted version of the CYRM-28 scale ( 13 ), was administered to measure participants' resilience. The CYRM-28 has demonstrated high reliability and validity in previous studies, although differences in the factor structure have been identified ( 11 , 27 , 29 31 ). The scale was adapted to suit the unique situation for Indigenous Australian boarding school students as illustrated in Table 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation