Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory in a Taiwanese Population

Ger, Luo Ping; Ho, Shung Tai; Sun, Wei‐Zen; Wang, Ming Shang; Cleeland, Charles S.

doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00087-1

Cited by 159 publications

(151 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall reliability of the IPO with a Cronbach"s alpha of 0.86 is satisfactory and in line with comparable validation studies 17,2,13,39,22,32 . The high Cronbach"s alpha of 0.89 for the subscale "pain intensity and pain interference (physical and emotional)" confirms the homogeneity of .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Patients' Perception of Postoperative Pain Management: Validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) Questionnaire

Rothaug

Zaslansky

Schwenkglenks³

et al. 2013

The Journal of Pain

138

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

UNLABELLED: PAIN OUT is a European Commission-funded project aiming at improving postoperative pain management. It combines a registry that can be useful for quality improvement and research using treatment and patient-reported outcome measures. The core of the project is a patient questionnaire-the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire-that comprises key patient-level outcomes of postoperative pain management, including pain intensity, physical and emotional functional interference, side effects, and perceptions of care. Its psychometric quality after translation and adaptation to European patients is the subject of this validation study. The questionnaire was administered to 9,727 patients in 10 languages in 8 European countries and Israel. Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis. Discriminant validity assessment used Mann-Whitney U tests to detect mean group differences between 2 surgical disciplines. Internal consistency reliability was calculated as Cronbach's alpha. Factor analysis resulted in a 3-factor structure explaining 53.6% of variance. Cronbach's alpha at overall scale level was high (.86), and for the 3 subscales was low, moderate, or high (range, .53-.89). Significant mean group differences between general and orthopedic surgery patients confirmed discriminant validity. The psychometric quality of the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire can be regarded as satisfactory. PERSPECTIVE: The International Pain Outcomes questionnaire provides an instrument for postoperative pain assessment and improvement of quality of care, which demonstrated good psychometric quality when translated into a variety of languages in a large European and Israeli patient population. This measure provides the basis for the first comprehensive postoperative pain registry in Europe and other countries. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 3 Abstract PAIN OUT is a European Commission-funded project aiming at improving postoperative pain (POP) management. It combines a registry that can be useful for quality improvement (QI) and research using treatment and patient-reported outcome measures. Core of the project is a patient questionnaire -the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire (IPO) that comprises key patient level outcomes of POP management including pain intensity, physical and emotional functional interference, side effects, and perceptions of care. Its psychometric quality after translation and adaptation to European patients is the subject of this validation study. The questionnaire was administered to 9,727 patients in 10 langu...

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Patients' Perception of Postoperative Pain Management: Validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) Questionnaire

Rothaug

Zaslansky

Schwenkglenks³

et al. 2013

The Journal of Pain

138

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The BPI uses a 10-point scale whereby 0 ϭ "no pain" and 10 ϭ "pain as bad as you can imagine" to evaluate intensity of pain (11). The BPI has shown its validity across cultural and linguistic backgrounds (12)(13)(14)(15) as well as diverse clinical situations (16 -19), including dialysis patients (1,20). On the basis of the BPI scale, pain was classified as mild (1 to 4 points), moderate (5 to 6 points), or severe (7 to 10 points) (20).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Calcium, Parathyroid Hormone, and Vitamin D

Golan¹,

Haggiag²,

Os³

et al. 2009

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objectives: Pain is a frequent complaint of hemodialysis (HD) patients, yet information regarding its causes and frequency is relatively scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and possible causes of chronic pain in patients who are on long-term HD.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients who were undergoing maintenance HD for at least 3 mo. Pain was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory. Data collected on each participant included age, gender, ethnic origin, body mass index, smoking habits, time on dialysis, type of blood access, comorbidities, and biochemical and hematologic parameters.Results: The average age was 64.5 yr; the average time on dialysis 40.4 mo. Forty-five patients were male. Thirty-one participants were of Arabic origin. Fifty-three patients had diabetes, 36 of whom had diabetic retinopathy. Although 51 patients experienced chronic pain, only 19.6% described the pain as severe. Musculoskeletal pain, neuropathic pain, and headache were the most prevalent forms of pain. The presence of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy (but not diabetes per se) and levels of intact parathyroid hormone, calcium, and calcitriol (but not 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 ) differed significantly between those who experienced chronic pain and those who did not. On a logistic regression model, higher serum calcium levels and intact parathyroid hormone levels >250 pg/ml were independently associated with chronic pain, as well as the presence of diabetic retinopathy. Calcitriol had a marginal effect.Conclusions: Disturbed mineral metabolism is strongly associated with chronic pain in long-term HD patients, along with microangiopathy.

show abstract

“…En el estudio que se realizó en Alemania, el coeficiente de correlación entre las dos medidas (antes y después de la consulta) fue del 0,98 para la severidad del dolor y del 0,97 para la interferencia del dolor (8). En la muestra tailandesa, el coeficiente de correlación varió entre el 0,67 y el 0,80 (9). En el estudio español el test-retest fue de 0,77 para la severidad del dolor y de 0,54 para la interferencia del dolor (12).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…En este estudio, los valores de KMO son buenos y revelan que el modelo se adapta a los datos (37). Se confirmaron los dos factores (severidad e interferencia del dolor), obtenidos en otras culturas (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15,16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) excepto en las muestras provenientes de Noruega (14) y de Estados Unidos (17), que revelaron una estructura factorial con tres dimensiones (factor 1: interferencia en la actividad diaria; factor 2: interferencia en el humor; factor 3: severidad del dolor). La varianza explicada de los factores presenta un valor superior al 50 % (37,38), semejante a la muestra española (12), lo que difiere de los valores de las muestras de Italia (51 %) (13) y de Rusia (80 %) (20).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…La escala se adaptó con mayor frecuencia para su uso en personas con dolor de origen oncológico (9)(10)(11)(12)14,17,18,(20)(21)(22) y, posteriormente, en personas con las siguientes patologías: dolor crónico no maligno (13,16), dolor crónico músculo-esquelético (6,7), osteoartritis (15), estrés postraumático (19) y sida (17). El tamaño de las muestras utilizadas en los diferentes estudios varió entre 75 (21) y 520 (10) personas con dolor.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validación del Brief Pain Inventory en personas con enfermedad renal crónica

Sousa¹,

Marques-Vieira²,

Severino³

et al. 2017

Aquichan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENObjetivo: comprobar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión portuguesa del Brief Pain Inventory, en personas con enfermedad renal crónica sometidas a hemodiálisis. Método: estudio metodológico. La muestra seleccionada está compuesta por 171 personas con enfermedad renal crónica que presentan dolor durante al menos 24 horas y realizan hemodiálisis en dos clínicas de la región de Lisboa, Portugal. Los datos se recogieron entre mayo y junio del 2015. Se evaluaron las siguientes propiedades psicométricas: validez (constructo, convergente y discriminante), confiabilidad (α de Cronbach) y estabilidad (test-retest). Resultados: se obtuvo información que apoya adecuadamente una estructura bifactorial (interferencia del dolor y grado de severidad del dolor), con confiabilidad (α = 0,90 y α = 0,80, respectivamente) y estabilidad. Las medidas registradas están correlacionadas de forma positiva con el afecto negativo, y de forma negativa, con las medidas de calidad de vida, que sustentan la validez concurrente. Se comprobó la existencia de apoyo para la validez predictiva. Conclusiones: las medidas del "grado de severidad del dolor" e "interferencia del dolor" que se obtuvieron a través del Brief Pain Inventory son válidas y reproducibles en personas con enfermedad renal crónica que presentaron dolor en las últimas 24 horas, cuando se utiliza el cuestionario y la entrevista. PALABRAS CLAVEInsuficiencia renal crónica; diálisis renal; dimensión del dolor; estudios de validación; psicometría (Fuente: DeCS, BIREME). Method: This is a methodological study. The selected sample is comprised of 171 persons with chronic kidney disease who experience pain for at least 24 hours and are undergoing hemodialysis at two clinics in Lisbon, Portugal. The data were collected between May and June 2015. The psychometric properties that were evaluated include validity (construct, convergent and discriminant), reliability (Cronbach's α) and stability (test-retest). Results: Information was obtained that adequately supports a bi-factor structure (pain interference and degree of pain severity), with reliability (α = 0.90 and α = 0.80, respectively) and stability. The measures registered correlate positively with the negative effect, and negatively, with measures of quality of life, which support concurrent validity. The existence of support for predictive validity was verified. Conclusions: The "pain severity" and "pain interference" measures obtained with the Brief Pain Inventory are valid and reproducible in persons with chronic kidney disease who experienced pain during the 24 hours before the questionnaire was used and the interview was conducted.

show abstract

Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory in a Taiwanese Population

Cited by 159 publications

References 11 publications

Patients' Perception of Postoperative Pain Management: Validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) Questionnaire

Patients' Perception of Postoperative Pain Management: Validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) Questionnaire

Calcium, Parathyroid Hormone, and Vitamin D

Validación del Brief Pain Inventory en personas con enfermedad renal crónica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About