2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01525-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of simple measures of aortic distensibility based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR: a new approach for clinical studies

Abstract: Objective Aortic distensibility (AD) represents a well-established parameter of aortic stiffness. It remains unclear, however, whether AD can be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta. This study investigated the intra-and inter-observer agreement of AD based on different angles of the aorta and provided a sample size calculation of AD for future trials. Methods Thirty-one patients underwent CMR. Angulation of the descending aorta was performed to obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure comparability and consistency of aortic compliance and distensibility measurements, the interobserver variability has been assessed. 34 To reduce the risk of overestimating vessel diameters, angulation errors were reduced using minimal cross-sectional diameters of the vessel. Furthermore, central blood pressure estimations are required for distensibility calculation and were not directly assessed by invasive heart catheterisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure comparability and consistency of aortic compliance and distensibility measurements, the interobserver variability has been assessed. 34 To reduce the risk of overestimating vessel diameters, angulation errors were reduced using minimal cross-sectional diameters of the vessel. Furthermore, central blood pressure estimations are required for distensibility calculation and were not directly assessed by invasive heart catheterisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%